Gunga ga lunga

gunga ga lunga gunga, gunga gunga, zimbo timbo tibia tibi tibi

"The clearest way into the Universe is through a forest wilderness."

 John Muir

 

Quod est ante pedes specta ubi coeli scrutantur

Ennius

(The legend from Plato was that Thales of Miletus accidentally fell down a well while looking up at the stars. The rescuer told him he should keep his mind on the earth as much as the stars.)

Section II

William Gilbert(1544-1603) made a typical shortsighted argument in support of the Copernican system, stating in Book 6, Chapter III of "De Magnete" that it was an absurdity to think that the immense celestial spheres rotate daily, as opposed to a hypothetical diurnal rotation of the much smaller earth. He argued that due to the "inordinate size" of the celestial spheres, if in fact the spheres existed at all, which he seemed to doubt, it was a better idea that the relatively tiny sphere of the earth would rotate every 24 hours, to account for day and night. 

"How far away from the earth are those remotest of stars: they are beyond the reach of eye, or man's devices, or man's thought. What an absurdity is this motion of [celestial] spheres".(1)

 

The mathematician and philosophe Simon Laplace (1749-1827) believed the same thing. In his 1796 treatise, "L'expostion du systeme du monde", he wrote about the sphere of the Sun: "is it not infinitely more simple to suppose that the globe we inhabit rotates about itself than to assume that a mass as considerable and as distant as the Sun moves with the extreme speed necessary for it to turn around the Earth in one day?"(2)

 

However, when heliocentrics like Gilbert, Laplace, and the others have thought it better to assume that the Earth revolves and orbits the Sun, because the Sun appears so big, impressive, and far away, they have not realized or admitted what a bad switch was made. Imagining it unreasonable to assume that the distant stars in their spheres all go around the Earth in a day, because they are so far away and would have to go so fast, they avoid acknowledging that to assume the Earth revolves and orbits the Sun only transfers the immense celestial motions of the distant stars and their spheres to the Earth, then making the Earth have to carry out astronomically gigantic and contradictory motions at once, which are impossible, without the Earth going to pieces. 

 

Compared with little window views from Earth, the magnitude of the cosmos is on a gigantic scale yet not "inordinate". There appears to be a design, and not out of order any more than the natural numbers themselves, that seem to climb so high, on and on, to infinity, or as far as counting can go.

For the Earth to be orbiting the sun in synchronization with the astronomical motions of the planets and distant stars then requires the Earth to have seven different speeds applied to it at once, not even counting the rpd’s for all the different latitudes. For the sake of appearances, heliocentrism has too much simultaneous work to do, too many places to be, and too much to explain, and would have the Earth going forward in loops, seven distinct speeds at once, besides spinning at many different velocities along its latitudes.

 

And with nobody noticing? It is impossible that this would be a reasonble way to account for the days, months, and years that can go by with such simple peace, and not even satellites have been able to detect any motion of the Earth.

 

When people say "tempus fugit", they already know that it means the days and the time fly away around the earth, not that the earth flies around them any more than a clock. From ancient Greek, the word κόσμος, "cosmos", means "something prepared and well ordered, a good arrangement and a proper system". Like the verb κοσμεῖν, when applied to the universe and firmament, it means the same thing.

 

It is not too difficult to see that two of the many incontrovertible signs that remove any logical possibilities for heliocentrism are the universal 24 hour day, and the magnitude and nature of the cosmos. Since the 24 hour day is universal across the Earth, and the Earth is a sphere, heliocentrism must have the Earth spin at many different speeds along its latitudes at once, as the dimensions of circumference change, according to parallels, vis-a-vis the equator. From the depths of outer space and astronomy, it would also say that the Earth flies about at seven different mountainous velcoities at once. But the scenario is not at all possible, unless the place is coming apart in a cloud of interstellar dust and ash.

 

As far as the absurd theory of the undetectable and unaccelerated yet immediate motion of the Earth, would people not notice if the Earth were flying apart and separating in so many directions? People may fear loose ground underfoot at a cliff's edge, but not the Earth wheeling around into celestial space, even as it would make the Earth fall apart and out of it everywhere. If people would not notice the Earth rolling along, with an undetectable motion, at many different and immediate astronomical speeds at once, would they not notice it dissolving in a whirlwind of chaos, since it cannot be more than one place at once?

 

According to heliocentrism, the Earth is orbiting the sun at an estimated rate of 66,600 mph, or 29.80 km/s, and also the galactic core, with the sun and the solar system, at anywhere from 492,130 to 446,000 mph. In addition to these two divergences, with the sun and the solar system, it supposedly is moving towards the constellation Hercules and the star Lambda Herculis at 43,200 mph, and moving upwards at about 90 degrees to the plane of the Milky Way Galaxy at 15,624 mph. Chaotically this could represent altogether a total figure for Earth flight velocity of 572,862 to 618,592 mph from four different courses.

 

If this was all, for totaling the chaos of heliocentrism and its insane version for what makes a day, it would be close, but coming up a little bit short. The poor earth should be threadbare also going 827,670 mph with respect to the cosmic microwave background radiation, the CMB, and orbiting with the Milky Way Galaxy a more distant localized group of galaxies, away off in the distance, at an estimated rate anywhere from 1,230,330 to 1,339,200 mph.

 

The seventh velocity for the earth, at the diabolical hands of heliocentrism, is a cool 2,184,000 mph with the Hubble flow around the "Great Atractor", which does not even have a specific location or stable point of reference, even in view of Chattanooga, Tennessee, where a scientific brochure says that one can see seven states from Lookout Mountain. For such an important place as the "Great Attractor" to have no location on a map of the cosmos with no center could seem a little strange and interrupted. Opera ingentia pendent interrupta, aequataque machina caelorum ... et absque centro. A vast work hangs interupted, in some comparison of the scheme of the heavens ... and from the center(3). 

Around and around the go-kart track: pedal to the metal, that's to the floor, never looking back. Eyes on the road up ahead, hands on the wheel, keep pushing the pedal, spin the competition out, off we go. Turning tight, so we don't hit the trees. 

 

 

A table of gigantic confusion speeds for the earth, according to heliocentrism, is as follows:

 
1. 66,600 mph around the sun
2. 492,130 to 446,000 mph around the galactic core, and then
3. 43,200 mph towards Lambda Herculis
4. 15,658 mph upwards to the plane of the Milky Way
5. 827,670 mph in view of the  cosmic microwave background radiation
6. 1,235,000 to 1,410,00 mph with the Milky Way around a localized group of distant galaxies
7. 2,184,000 mph with the Hubble flow around the "Great Atractor"
 

The earth would have all these astronomical velocities applied to it at once, because of "gravity" and for the sake of heliocentrism, and then different speeds of rotation North and South across all the latitudes.

 
 
And the Chinese have made many noodles and restaurants, and say that "near to rivers, we recognize fish, near to mountains, we recognize the songs of birds. It is very important to make on-the-spot investigations": 近 水 知 鱼 性, 近 山 识 鸟 音 (jìn shuǐ zhī yú xìng, jìn shān shí niǎo yīn). And it remains true as Huey to Dewey and Louie Duck that "the wisest of the wise will never make a crab walk straight"(4); but honest science could leave all this rubbish at the gate, and return to where there once was logic, some real possibility with facts, and a peaceful afternoon for the categorical wisdom of Aristotle.
 
As all points on Earth are mathematically of the same unitary distribution, as in a sphere, being composed together in a simple body with “haecceitas”, if any locality on Earth spins, then it all spins. If any area on Earth does not rotate, then none of it rotates. If any town on Earth rotates any one speed, then all of it goes that same speed, and it cannot fly through the universe many different speeds at once.
 
Even for woods, water, and earth, in terms of any worldwide motion and worldwide affects, it is either all or one, or nothing more than chaos and the unassuageable void of the abyss. With this kind of cosmic situation of logic and physics, some things like heliocentrism simply are impossible, not even for a beach ball, and an argument from impossibility is very strong in law: argumentum ab impossibilii plurimum valet in lege. 
 
Besides the preposterous incongruities attending acentric cosmology, sic passim pro diebus omnibus, if heliocentrism were able to have its cake and eat it too, and have many separable velocities and motions at once, for all the latitudes along the spherical curvature of the Earth, the math is still not right but reverse. For forward motion, as they would have it, it all turns illogical and backwards, against the principle moment of inertia.
 
Stepping back to look at the Earth from space, with Marvin the Martian or Martin Sheen, the Equator’s circumference is about 24,902 miles and its radius is about 3,963. Therefore, the 60th parallel North and all its neighborhoods comprise a circle of latitude about half that size around. Based on gear ratios, it has half the moment of inertia and half the cogs and terrestrial steps of the Equator. It should therefore turn twice as fast as the Equator to keep up for a day along the meridians. Littler wheels have to turn faster than bigger wheels to keep up; and if a high wheel bicycle with a clown goes rolling by, the big wheel on his bike turns slower than the littler wheel in comparison.
 
As a high wheel bicycle goes one speed per time, the big wheel twice the size of a little wheel turns with half the radial velocity for any linear speed of the bike. The bigger wheel has a greater moment of inertia and radius and turns slower than the littler wheel.
 
When Peggy an ice skater is spinning in circles, she spins faster with her arms pulled in, because the moment of inertia in the circle is reduced. If she held her arms out, she would not spin so fast, and would have increased the moment of inertia by increasing the radius and extension of weight. 
 
The ratios are always consistent: a big wheel with four times the size of a little wheel will turn with one quarter the radial velocity of the littler wheel, and so on.
 
Since heliocentrism wants to have separable speeds and motion for latitudes, see how crazy it is. If two parallels like the 60th and the Equator could be of divided origins of motion, as they were turning and rolling forward in space, they would have to spin at ratios exactly the opposite from what heliocentrism has for them today. The circumference at the Equator is much greater, having twice the radius and twice the moment of inertia as the 60thparallel. The different speeds quoted today for these two circles of the Earth, therefore, should be the reverse of how they are now, if they did have separate velocities of motion around.
 
With the Equator as the big wheel of a high wheel bike, and the 60th parallel as the little wheel, then when put forward in motion, the heliocentric math there is backwards everywhere in physics. The gear ratios of Copernicus and NASA are off. In terms of radial velocities converted into linear ones, for any true forward motion in space, in separable parts, Quito, Ecuador, for example, should be spinning slower and half the speed of Helsinki, Finland, not 519 mph faster.
 
Continuing with heliocentric incongruities, by converting radial to linear velocity, the 75th parallel at the Arctic Circle, running through Norway, should be going four times as fast as any equatorial towns around the globe --- to hit the same track at the same speed in outer space --- but instead it is supposedly going 769 mph slower.
 
Theorizing that the Earth orbits the sun, with no proof other than the progress of day and night, and then figuring first from time to the exclusion of space, for their crazy numbers, they have encountered accidentally a few persistent and inevitable problems. It is not scientific but ridiculous, in fact, for heliocentrism to pretend that it represents any sort of rational cosmology.
 
While correct there is a universal 24 hour day around the earth, it is incorrect and rather off to say that the Earth spins at many different speeds along its latitudes to account for it. Incorrect to say that the Earth can move several different times at once, or be in more than one place for a moment, or that there can be more than one Earth, and that the Earth is not unique. 
 
“Heaven cannot brook two suns, nor Earth two masters”, and as Heaven cannot brook two suns, the circle of a sphere has only one center, from which it is spun by the web of radians. The Earth does not have two or more different authentic codes of time and space that are real and to the point simultaneously. One chess grand master said about it and the game, "simple is better than complex. If something is too complicated, it does not mean that it is very clear. Quite the contrary, most probably it is something completely wrong."
 
 
As much as bad chess from a computer, for random complicatons heliocentrism is complicated, as things can be when facts are reversed and the world turned upside down. Yet, however boiled down in the pieces, it and geocentrism are not equally transferable. The winner and loser are not the same, and it is not a draw or stalemate. With heliocentrism the queen is overloaded, the bishop hanging en prise, and the position and the pawns are lost.
 
The math for them is not the same, and, like Hawaii and Kenya, they are not the same difference. They do not both make sense and say fundamentally contradictory things at the same time about the same things. Heliocentrism is the wrong code all over, in all parts, because even if the terrestrial sphere were orbiting the sun at 66,600 mph, which is 29.8 km/per second, which it most certainly is not, it could not be moving in space around the sun, and with the solar system, with many separable speeds and simultaneous motions without coming totally unstrung.
 
The uniformity of motion in an integrally sound sphere is evident again in the wheels on any high wheel bicycle and bicycle shop. With total mag wheel surfaces instead of spokes, paint the smaller wheel blue, which would be ¼ the size of the larger wheel, and with one white radius line. Paint blue the same 1/4 area of the larger wheel, and the remaining ¾ of the larger wheel red, with one white radius line through the blue and the red. Line the two white radii up horizontally to the ground. When they begin to roll, the bigger wheel has by 4 a proportionally greater moment of inertia and longer radius, and it will turn proportionally slower than the littler wheel, as the bike goes down the hill or across the road. Watch as the bicycle goes by. The little blue wheel turns 4 times as fast as the bigger wheel. Although the blue areas in the two wheels are of the same radius, it is evident that the blue area within the larger wheel turns slower and with the same speed as the rest of the bigger wheel. This is because the areas within either wheel move conformably with their respective origins of motion.
 
In the case of the two wheels of a high wheel bicycle, there are three origins of motion: two immediate and one remote, and three species of velocity. The remote origin of motion is from pedals, chain, and rider --the proximate cause. The two immediate ones to the road are the two wheels themselves that necessarily turn at different rates from their forks. The two wheels have different velocities of rpm, one distinct rate at a time for each one, and two different moments of inertia, as the bike itself has one linear velocity per time, as it goes along ... into the traffic in front of the Judeo-Masonic Compound of the UN or wherever.
 
The composition of area within the wheels in motion must have only one speed at a time, and be in one place at a time, going one direction at a time. For it cannot be any other way.
 
If another high wheel bicycle like the first rolls by, with a chessboard pattern in the middle of the wheels, each chessboard will turn one uniform speed at a time, with one motion conformable to the whole. From square to square, files and rows, from a1 to h8, and h1 to a8, with the same proportions of 1 to 4 between them as before, from big wheel to little wheel, there it goes.
 
The smaller wheel separated from the bigger wheel must have greater angular velocity for the same linear speed; and the entire bike itself, as a whole, is only one vehicle in motion and must have one linear velocity, place, and direction at a time. The high wheel bike cannot go two different speeds at the same time, not even for Captain Kirk.
 
"That which is universal among men carries the weight of truth"(5), and everybody can notice the simple details; but nobody has ever been able to recognize that the Earth spins, with separable latitudes de motu quoque, big wheels or little wheels, spinning and spinning, round and round.
 
With correct terms of ontology and logic in order, even today, in fact, unless there is an earthquake, a rockslide, a volcanic eruption, an avalanche, or a terrible earth-shattering storm, the Earth is quiet and has an attractive stillness about it all day. Simple and honest people everywhere witness the great composure and terrestrial solemnity, and nobody notices it turning or wobbling on its axis. People sense it like the weather and the atmosphere, and like weather and atmosphere such a natural fact of awareness can even seep into the bones, with some certainty of cognition, where the better form of knowledge is that which becomes a part of the knowing knower.
 
The Greek word for it from the old desert solitudes is hésuchia, ἡσυχία, which means stillnes, and with lucidity and peace. 
 
 
 
Section III
 
 
 
 
Nevertheless "modern life is chaos, not Cosmos. As such it lacks a center, is meaningless, aimless"(6), but not even satellites or the International Space Station, or golfers with the greatest second sight, as the Scottish call intuition, have been able to detect any motion of the Earth. The detectable undetectable unaccelerated motion of the Earth is simply amazing, when nobody can tell when everybody can.
 
 
 
"... no one has ever proved the Earth to be in motion and hence there remains the possibility that this (supposed) phenomenon of our moving through space, which Einstein (and the official scientific community) considered 'already proven', after all does not even exist ..."(7)
 

If natural occurrence, for motion to remain so, it would have to be more than constant. To go undetected and immediately and always unrecognizable, of the Earth itself, it would have to be incredibly preternaturally subtle, that nobody and no scientific test could uncover it, except the tiny little people in the grass.

But the Earth is not so diminutive, subtle, or distant, but rather massively obvious, with direct contact right under everybody's feet, magnified to the greatest priority among all things that are on it. It is always too near not to notice if it were flying.

The most self-evident property, and clearly not moving, as Ptolemy outlined long before, if the Earth were orbiting the sun, it would have a tremendous astronomical circuit to keep, and an overwhelming velocity greater than that of all the other motions taking place across it. Since it would have to be making so great a circuit in so short a time, the bodies which are not at rest on it would always appear to have motions much less and contrary to its own, and all motions on Earth would be outstripped and left behind by the Earth’s greater weight and momentum.

All the animals and loose objects, therefore, like aspirin and butterflies, birds, leaves, bees, empty beer cans, and thistledown, would fail to go eastward without great difficulty, because the Earth would be spinning away from underneath them and tremendously. Dandelion seed heads, pollen puffs and cigarette butts sifting in the air, arrows and squirrels, et cetera, would forever be falling behind the Earth’s overwhelming flight into the Eastern sky. After the exhaustion of so much torque and so many days of heliocentric madness, all would tend to fall back to the West. Even the buildings and trees would become worn out from it, falling back to the West, due to the erosive effects of occidental dilapidation.

What is left of the Roman Colosseum in 157 feet of four levels after almost 2,000 years would be long gone. Ave Caesar, morituri te salutant.

 

But, for fairness' sake, let such an elementary school matter also be in people’s feet, and common sense experience of life: in the circles from the feet up and around everybody everywhere. Quod est ante pedos specta ubi coeli scrutantur.(8) Look at what is in front of you too when studying the stars. Should one have knowledge by heavenly things so far above, yet not know what is here on the ground?

 

With impartial foot the truth knocks at the door of the poor man’s cottage and at the prince’s gate. Aequo pulsat pede veritatis pauperam tabernas regemque turris(9)

 

If people can notice when they have fallen into a well, and things like leverage, and momentum of mechanical advantage in merry-go-rounds, and Ferris wheels, how could they not notice if the Earth were rolling along like a bowling ball through space, and at such massive speeds? 

It is not wise to let for want of repair a real house fall down to build a castle in the air,(10) and any scene that could not get more quiet and have less noise can fit the Earth. "The whole Earth is quiet and still, it is glad and hath rejoiced. Conquievit et siluit omnis terra, gavisa est, et exultavit,” etc.(11)

 

"Inter sylvas Academi quaerere verum", amid the woods of the Academy to seek the truth, and people on golf courses gathered as much. In golf they say that it is an easy game because the ball is not moving, and they mean the ball is not moving when time to hit and neither is the Earth. It would be insane if it were otherwise. They all have to be quiet when a fellow gets ready to play his shot; and it always seems like the Earth is already completely quiet before them. Think of anything that could not get more quiet first. 

 

Veritas de terra orta est. Truth is sprung out of the earth(12), and if a golfer lost a ball to the woods, he cannot claim a free drop, without penalty, because the earth rotated from underneath the line of flight. If that would be the decision, because he was hitting along a difficult line of longitude, north or south, no one else would agree. If that was how he kept score, others would say he was cheating, as much as when he plays by himself, because obviously the earth is not moving. After all, "by nature everything is just as it is." Esse quam videri: literally, to be what it is, they say in North Carolina, or what you see is what you get. 

 

Yet with virtue and honesty not so many are gifted as wish to seem so. "Virtute enim ipsa non tam multi praediti esse quam videri volunt"(13).

Nevertheless, they say silence is golden, like peace and goodness: "silentium est aureum quam pax et bonum". But how does a marketer of relativity and the heliocentric world-theory of spin-city buy it? There is all the noise and weird spaceship money involved in modernist science, that keeps going around, in predictions and results, yet some people are not so dumb when they notice the total stillness and silence of the woods. Nobody ever notices the Earth making a motion or a sound, as undoubtedly it would, if it were orbiting the sun. Instead people can almost hear a pin drop anywhere things get really quiet.

 

George Berkeley, an 18th century philosopher, had a motto for his books, “esse est percipi vel percipere,” to be is perceived or perceiving. To perceive as much as perceiving, "nothing we use or hear or touch can be expressed in words that equal what is given by the senses"(14). "Image is everything" said Andre Agassi on the TV commercials, and if the Earth were really rotating and orbiting the sun, spinning and spinning, flying through space, why is it then that it is never perceived? How can that be when no one ever senses it at all?

 
Human nature cannot know the mystery of an art without experience, and perception is always expressed of existence. One who knows perceives what he knows, and knowledge is perception as well as proof.(15) "Knowledge is ultimate" and in divinis to know and to be would even coincide.(16)
 
For survivors of hazardous days, accurate perception is like gold, and "gold does not really change its value. An ounce of gold is an ounce of gold. It was an ounce of gold 5,000 years ago. It will be an ounce of gold 1,000 years from now ... a constant and long standing store of value."(17) When the price of gold is going up or down, what is fluctuating is the current price, not gold itself. Therefore, call 1-800 and buy now. 
 
“Perceptio aurum”, perception is gold, averred Governor Agricola of ancient history and cable TV.
 
Especially in the wilderness of modern life, with so many horrendous lies and abuses from the Judeo-Masonic NWO conspiracy on the loose, and all around, many modern people and animal friends today fall through the cracks in the floor, who would yet live or die by their wits. In the wilds and in the city, they live and die by what they perceive and do. The most acute perceptions can sense many things, enough to save a life from misadventure on occasion, but never that the Earth is wheeling around in space, making gigantic and astronomical numbers in time, like bats out of hidden NASA caves and weird Area 51 secrets in Nevada, or the “Federal” Reserve Bank and Wall Street, et cetera.
 
 
 
 
Peceptio aurum, vel numquam aliud natura aliud sapientiae dixit. Perception is gold and never has nature said one thing, wisdom another. Pontus Maximus observed that "when the little grey mouse has stolen the right amount of cheese, it was never too much".
 
 
As much as the eyes have an apple, people use the power of sight to survive, and vision is the best way to develop awareness. "The keenest of all our senses is the sense of sight"(18). 
 
Isidore of Seville, for example, thought letters of the alphabet were were signs of things and mysterious figures, and were so powerful because "without a voice they speak to us the words of the absent; for they introduce words by the eye, not by the ear ... sine voce loquantur nobis dicta absentium; enim introducunt verba per oculos non per aures". (19)
 
As they may read or live, folks must look ahead to see what is in front, and from side to side to see what is around, and above and below. That way they get the meaning, and unless they have eyes in the back of their head, they will turn around to see what is behind, before a sneaking shadow or big terrible cat should catch them unawares. Folks need to see what is moving one way or the other, and what is not. With the greatest value of life itself placed before them, through all the ages of mankind, with whatever proper and total adherence of vision, no one has yet seen the earth spin.
 
As it would be life science and worthwhile comprehension, to survive and contiune as a species, if a golf course and a small local airport lost their radial Earth-flight velocity in gradual steps of 40 mph, at what point could people start to tell what was going on? When would somebody pick up the phone and call NASA?
 
For instance, located at 33”30’ N, and with an estimated 865 mph daily spin, Augusta National could lose all of its angular velocity in a day like that, if it only lost 36 mph to an hour. At 36 x 24 = 864, Augusta, Georgia would have only 1 mph left of spin left to spare at the end of the day.
 
On such a day, over a 4 ½ hour round of golf, a foursome out on the course, in the pines, the bushes, and in the water, could lose 144 mph of total terrestrial momentum, with which they had started from rotation for their latitude, and nobody would notice for any of the lost golf balls or bad luck? If they came back later the next day, the golf course and the local airport would not be moving. It would be like “The Day the Earth Stood Still” unless they were skidding through space at 66,600 mph and the 6 other cosmic speeds, without their rotation counted in, that they had lost, and what would that seem like?
 
Presumably they could not notice any skidding, bumping, and crashing through space of the Earth then, without the spinning around, anymore than they could not notice any of it before, with all the counter-clockwise roll. One could guess that it would seem just like it always had before, before the day the earth stood still and they lost the spin, since it never seemed like the Earth was really moving or rotating at all in the first place.
 
As Hendrik Lorentz confessed after the Michelson-Morley experiments of 1887, the year that Willie Park Jr. won the British Open at Prestwick: "Briefly, everything occurs as if the earth were at rest."(20)
 
On the other hand, if the Earth did not lose its spin and some perceptive people went to the Shaughnessy Heights Golf Club in Vancouver British Columbia at 49”13’27 N, therefore with 677.6469766684105 mph daily radial velocity, and then to El Condado Golf and Tennis Club in Quito, Ecuador, at the Equator, therefore with 1038 mph daily radial velocity, would they not notice any of the astronomical differences in playing conditions between these courses?
 
If Quito lost half its motor for a sudden 519 mph drop, and changed to the tune of the 60th parallel, and Helsinki, Finland, would nobody notice?
 
The strangest days that it could be either way.
 
If they went to Tromso Golf Park at Breivikeidet near Tromso, Norway, at latitude 69”39’30 N, therefore with 360.6822404339137 mph daily radial velocity, in the land of the midnight sun, and then to The Billy Joss Golf Club in Ulukhaktok, in Canada’s Northwest Territories, amid tundra off the Amundsen Gulf in the Beaufort Sea, at latitude 70”44’11 N, therefore with 342.314214650617 mph daily radial velocity, would they not begin to notice the different ways the Earth was supposedly turning, spinning, and burning, in different places?
 
How could it not be part of the way the game was being played? Would they be stoned, if they could not tell what was going on? Only to "rise and vanish like an oblivious host, shadows of life whose very soul is lost? So let it lie, -- the lost golf ball and the grass below; scorecard and pencil, above the vaulted sky."(21)
 
 
Who would not be able to play his next shot for commotion of fairway, bunker, or green, because the Earth was moving ... and moving too fast, even if changing gears and slowing down? Patrick Henry said, "I have but one lamp by which my feet are guided, and that is the lamp of experience", and the wise, humane, and philosophic statesman must deal with facts as he finds them.

Why do we leave for lands warmed by a foreign sun? What fugitive from his own land can flee from himself? Quid terras alio calentes sole mutamus? Patria quis exul se quoque fugit?(22)
 
And "Socrates was told that some man had not been improved by travel. 'I am sure he was not', he said. 'He went with himself!' "(23)
 
"Let each man choose the road he should take," unusquisque sua noverit ire via, "but if you do not first lighten yourself and your soul of the weight of your burdens, moving about will only increase their pressure on you"(24).
 

As soul would be to eyes, and eyes would be to soul, "the eyes of Lyncaeus were said to see through the earth, and we are symbols and inhabit symbols" of something deeper, hidden in forms and logic.(25) A cavernous silhouette overshadows the workman, the golfer, the student and the talent, and the prince and the pauper; and the words and things they use and trade, and the consolations of philosophy are reflections and shadows of the mind, emblems of something secreted away in the universe.

"Flags and fags of our fathers", said Robert the Bruce who lived in a cave where he talked to a spider, and "the cave you fear to enter holds the treasue you seek."

Si homines Lynceis oculis haberent, ut quaeque obstantia penetrarent, ita verum viderentur. If humans could use the eyes of Lynceus, so that their sight might penetrate obstructions, they would then see reality.(26)

And the symbols and habitations of heliocentrism are unhinged, thoroughly confused and divorced from reality. Geocentrism, on the other hand, "turns the world to glass, and shows us all things in their right series and procession", and "through that better perception, [it] stands one step nearer to things" as they are.(27) What a relief for those who would prefer some pleasant scope of reality.

 
As much as Scotland adding up like a small mountain and sands of time by the North Sea, the entire game of golf is a world of direct validity and scientific evidence for geocentrism and none at all for heliocentrism. There is witchcraft that would turn a man into a newt, yet there is no testable basis in science or way of keeping score for Newton's theory of universal gravitation by the inverse squared or Einstein's theory of relativity. Everything the false frame of reference does as a game demonstrates by contradiciton that the Earth is not moving, and that it is not true that no one can tell.
 
Going to the 75th parallel of the Arctic Circle, with only shag bags, beer, and cigarettes, and no golf course pro shop profit center in the wilderness, it would be a telling 769 mph drop from El Condado in Quito.
 
What travellers might notice one day is that, in terms of Earth spins, everywhere they go it actually seems like the North or South pole, and the equator under a Foucault pendulum, in terms of tempo, because the North and South poles are at 90” N and 90” S, respectively, and, therefore, have a cosine value of (0), which indicates they are not actually spinning ab locis.
 
From a 90” angle from the Equator and cosine value of (0), they are situated in two places with a (0) mph spin, which is no action, of course. It would be like the poles are not rotating at all but held stationary in space. Unless (0) mph is in motion, they are not revolving; and (0) mph is not in motion. Could anybody wait at the starting line of a Formula One race better than at (0) mph?
 
No one could wait at the starting line of a Formula One race better than at 0 mph, and all of the Earth's rotational velocity is necessarily stuck between these two poles, North and South.
 
And yet, still being one sphere with “haecceitas”, the Earth can only go one speed at a time, with a uniform motion conformable to the whole, as a simple body cannot move away from itself. So based upon experience and trigonometry, the Earth really must be revolving at (0) mph like the North and South poles, since that is what it always seems like, and that is what all scientific experiments have shown.
 
Strix varia sapit, enim qui pauca loquitur
 
A wise old owl sat upon an oak
The more he heard the less he spoke
Now wasn't he a wise old bird
 
Tacitum sylvas inter reptare salubres, currantem quidquid dignum sapiente bonoque est. Walking in silence through the healthy woods, pondering questions worthy of the wise and good.(28)
 
 
 
When people believe heliocentrism, they imagine it is undetectable and "unaccelerated" and, therefore, that is also an oxymoron that is practically “slow”. So slow, they figure that the Earth is turning and moving so slowly in space that they do not notice it revolving from day to changing day.
 
As the old gyroscope huckster Foucault wrote in the “Journal de Debats”, on March 31, 1851, the “slowness” of the “movement of the Earth” … “requires us to turn to well-developed methods” for recognition of it.(29) But this is not reasonable. In view of the magnitude of the cosmos, if the Earth were moving round and round to account for the passing of day and night, it could not be slowly. It would necessarily have to be at enormous astronomical rates through the seasons and years, incredibly fast and impossible, which obviously it is not.
 
The Earth is continuously obvious  and massive and near, not scientifically remote, and whatever motion it may have could not remain so subtle or diminished as to be undetectable to all the people and scientists in common who are living on it.
 
For phenomena like the Earth to revolve, fly, tilt, wobble, and bowl around the Sun through the seasons and the years, and unnoticed, it would have to be with such an incredibly hidden and preternatural turn all the time that it simply could not be something within a category of natural phenomenon anyway. And that way Galileo's, Kepler's, and Newton's theories of "gravity" would not be part of the simple continuity of natural science.
 

Abacinated by woeful complications, and blind as bats to the glory and blaze of day, so is heliocentrism to the self-evident science of actual awareness and the trasnfixed immobility of the earth. The captive unreason in it to things which by nature are most evident and simple is stupefying.

 

Nobody can tell when the Earth rotates at 0 mph except to say that that is apparently not moving. Nobody can tell when it spins 1038 mph or 1040 mph except to say that the day is 24 hours in Ecuador, as it is everywhere else. Nobody can tell when it tilts anywhere in between. Nobody can tell if it ever jolts or crashes, but people can recognize when things in much smaller scales are jolted or go crashing across its surface.

 

For instance, on a sunny afternoon in September, a colorful hot air balloon takes off into the sky from an immaculate field; and the crowd sees the aircraft ascend and move away from the earth, and the passengers and pilot in the wicker basket see the same. Whether on the ground or in the air, all the little people involved in the occasion see the same momentary passage of time and the balloon flying away from the earth. Moving away from each other, the balloon and the crowd, and growing smaller and smaller in each other’s sight, they witness that the field does not move, as the earth does not move, as the balloon flies in any direction to some lofty altitude. It is the same with all weather and spy satellites in low Earth orbit, and onward to the Moon and the Sun that both orbit the earth, from east to west every day.

 

The amazing morphology of the elements in the seasons of the natural world marvels the mind, for a lasting impression on all the senses, yet heliocentrism would rather make chaos of the wonderful order and simplicity of the days. A beautiful vision that works all weeks, per singulos dies and up to a few millenia, would be cast away into an abyss of confusion and blindness.

 

If people tend to notice sleek and continuous things, like the fluent, the rich, the plush, and the passing of time and grammatical genitives of association, like "the advantages of peace", "commoda pacis", for example, and nice weather, they would tend to notice if the Earth were moving, even if it were with a perfectly constant speed, if it were possible.

 

They say one does not notice the rotations of the Earth because gravity and inertia are ever-constant and so refined. But obviously the spinning world is not constant but changes from latitude to latitude, even by degrees, minutes, and seconds of arc. The conditional orbit is very diverse with contradictory movements and purposes of place, and would be very confused, acentric, and impossible.

 

Heliocentrism though would escape the senses and all objective scientific observations, if it could, but it cannot escape mathematics and logic, even for astronomy. A simple body that is as unique as the one and only one that it is cannot be going many different speeds at the same time without coming apart.

As Colonel Bonaventure says, "the Central Intelligence Agency owns everyone of any significance in the major media".

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lN-4lX0QyZc 

 

Since it reaches a point of absurdity where scientists today say the Earth orbits the Sun at an estimated rate of 66,600 mph, or 29.80 km/s, and the galactic core, with the Sun and the solar system, at anywhere from 492,130 to 446,000 mph; and also supposedly flies towards the constellation Hercules and the star Lambda Herculis at 43,200 mph, and upwards at about 90 degrees to the plane of the Milky Way Galaxy at 15,624 mph; and would have the Earth proceed 827,670 mph with respect to the cosmic microwave background radiation, the CMB, and orbit with the Milky Way Galaxy a more distant localized group of galaxies, away off in the distance, at an estimated rate anywhere from 1,230,330 to 1,339,200 mph, and breeze along at 2,184,000 mph with the Hubble flow around the "Great Attractor" -- a generalized feeling of aetherized confusion could set in, like J. Alfred Prufrock aetherized upon a table, beneath the detectable undetecatble unaccelerated motion of the earth among the stars.

"Let us go then, you and I,
When the evening is spread out against the sky
Like a patient etherized upon a table;
Let us go, through certain half-deserted streets,
The muttering retreats ...

And sawdust restaurants with oyster-shells ...

Time for you and time for me,
And time yet for a hundred indecisions,
And for a hundred visions and revisions,
 
And the afternoon, the evening, sleeps so peacefully!
 
Would it have been worth while,
To have squeezed the universe into a ball
To roll it towards some overwhelming question,
To say: 'I am Lazarus, come from the dead,
Come back to tell you all, I shall tell you all'— "
 
 
... and would the out-of-touch numbers of Copernicus, Gilbert, Kepler, Galileo, Newton, NASA and Einstein not seem exaggerated or crazy?

 

Like a bad joke of déjà vu, more than one speed at the same time, who has not noticed before that science cannot notice the relationship, and that it is all the same? For there is no way to see this sign. How did the cosmic mouse of such astronomical numbers get so small that he always scurries into the corners and disappears, where the earth is never moving?

 

Ubi hoc orbis deest, where this circle ends, vere non compos mentis sunt. "What need is there to weep over parts of life, when the whole of it calls for tears," and none of heliocentrism is even remotely possible without the Earth coming apart like a murder of crows in the "Omen".

A cursed and diabolical theory in flight, in the classic sense of the word "diabolism", διαβολικός , which means “to throw across, to break apart”. It kills the eye with unapparent wounds, like the imperial basiliskWith the acentric cosmology of heliocentrism, things are thrown far across and broken apart, like an image of chaos from Yeats’ poem “The Second Coming”, where the center cannot hold:

 

Turning and turning in the widening gyre
The falcon cannot hear the falconer;
Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold;
Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world,
The [heliocentric] tide is loosed, and everywhere
The ceremony of innocence is drowned;
The best lack all conviction, while the worst
Are full of passionate intensity.

 

Still all material objects have a center, as much as all probabilities have their mean, median, and mode, and the universe contains them all. Therefore, the universe has a center too; and common sense remains a primary form of proof in science, as much as logic, even where heliocentrism lacks it, for powerful and reasonable evidence for geocentrism is all around. 

 

Everything is a type and a measure, and the measure of the days is against heliocentrism, as much as they are not chaos. For example, the shadows of any eclipse disprove heliocentric theories of gravity and inertial relativity right away, as none of them are subject to gravity or inertia, and they all go to the East. They all move slowly to the East, and the Earth never spins away from under them.