Gunga ga lunga
gunga ga lunga gunga, gunga gunga, zimbo timbo tibia tibi tibi
"The clearest way into the Universe is through a forest wilderness."
Quod est ante pedes specta ubi coeli scrutantur
(The legend from Plato was that Thales of Miletus accidentally fell down a well while looking up at the stars. The rescuer told him he should keep his mind on the
earth as much as the stars.)
Gilbert(1544-1603) made a typical and shortsighted argument in support of the Copernican system, stating in Book 6, Chapter III of "De Magnete" that it was an absurdity to think that the immense celestial spheres rotate daily, as opposed to a hypothetical
diurnal rotation of the much smaller earth. He argued that due to the "inordinate size" of the celestial spheres, if in fact the spheres existed at all, which he seemed to doubt, it was a better idea that the relatively tiny sphere of the earth would
rotate every 24 hours, to account for day and night.
"How far away from the earth are those remotest of stars: they are beyond the reach of eye, or man's devices, or man's
thought. What an absurdity is this motion of [celestial] spheres".-1
The mathematician and philosophe Simon Laplace (1749-1827) believed the same. In his 1796 treatise, "L'expostion du systeme du
monde", he wrote about the sphere of the Sun: "is it not infinitely more simple to suppose that the globe we inhabit rotates about itself than to assume that a mass as considerable and as distant as the Sun moves with the extreme speed necessary for it to
turn around the Earth in one day?"-2
However, when heliocentrics like Gilbert, Laplace, and
the others have thought it better to assume that the world revolves to orbit the Sun, because the Sun appears so big, impressive, and far away, they have not realized or admitted what a bad switch was made. Imagining it unreasonable to assume that the distant
stars in their spheres all go around the Earth in a day, because they are so far away and would have to go so fast, they avoid acknowledging that to assume the terrestrial world revolves and orbits the Sun only transfers the immense celestial motions of the
distant stars and their spheres to it, then making the Earth have to carry out astronomically gigantic and contradictory motions at once, which are impossible, without the place going to pieces.
How better to understand a little than misunderstand a lot, and if the magnitude of the cosmos appears on a gigantic scale compared with little window views from Earth, still
it is not "inordinate". What is common to anything is common to all of it. There seem to be common properties in a design, and it is not out of order for the extent any more than the natural numbers themselves, that seem to climb so high, and
continue on and on, to infinity, or as far as counting can go.
People may travel the world or stay at home to look at the stars in a drunken stupor. And what a pleasure it is that
"seeing seems at any moment to be complete, for it does not lack anything which coming into being later will complete its form. Pleasure also seems to be of this nature, for it is a whole, and at no time can one find a pleasure whose form will be completed
if it lasts longer" -- but for the Earth to be orbiting the sun in synchronization with the motions of the planets and distant stars then requires it to have seven different speeds at once, not even counting the rpd’s for all the different latitudes.
For the sake of appearances, heliocentrism has too much simultaneous work to do, too many places to be, too many rivers and mountains to cross, and too much to explain, and would
have the terra firma going forward in loops, seven distinct speeds at once, besides spinning at many different velocities along its latitudes.
No pleasure at all, and with nobody noticing? It is impossible that this would be a reasonble way to account for the days, months, and years that can go by with such simplicity and peace, and not even satellites have
been able to detect any motion of the Earth.
When people say "tempus fugit", they already
know that it means the days and the time fly away around the earth, not that the earth flies around them any more than a clock. From ancient Greek, the word κόσμος, "cosmos", means "something prepared and well ordered, a good arrangement and a proper system". Like the verb κοσμεῖν, when applied to the universe and firmament, it means the same thing.
It is not too difficult to see, therefore, that two of the many incontrovertible signs that remove any logical possibilities for heliocentrism are the universal 24 hour day, and the magnitude and nature of the cosmos. Since
the 24 hour day is universal across Earth, and the Earth is a sphere, heliocentrism must have it spin at many different speeds along its latitudes at once, as the dimensions of circumference change, according to parallels vis-a-vis the equator. And from
the depths of outer space and astronomy, it would also say that the Earth flies about with multiple mountainous velocities at once and overall. But the scenario is not at all possible, unless the place is coming apart in a cloud of interstellar dust and
As far as the absurd theory of the undetectable unaccelerated yet immediate motion of
the Earth, would people not notice if the Earth were flying apart and separating in so many directions? People may fear loose ground underfoot, at the knife's edge of a cliff, but not the Earth wheeling around into celestial space, even as it would make the
Earth disintegrate. If people would not notice the Earth rolling along, with an undetectable motion, at many immediate astronomical speeds at once, would they not notice it dissolving in a whirlwind of chaos, since it cannot be more than one place at once?
According to heliocentrism, the Earth is orbiting the sun at an estimated rate of 66,600 mph, or 29.80
km/s, and also the galactic core, with the sun and the solar system, at anywhere from 492,130 to 446,000 mph. In addition to these two divergences, with the sun and the solar system, it supposedly is moving towards the constellation Hercules and the star Lambda
Herculis at 43,200 mph, and moving upwards at about 90 degrees to the plane of the Milky Way Galaxy at 15,624 mph. Chaotically this could represent altogether a total figure for Earth flight velocity of 572,862 to 618,592 mph from four different courses.
If this was all, for totaling the chaos of heliocentrism and its insane version for what makes a
day, it would be close, but coming up a little bit short. The poor earth should be threadbare rather, also going 827,670 mph with respect to the cosmic microwave background radiation, the CMB, and orbiting with the Milky Way Galaxy a more distant localized
group of galaxies, away off in the distance, at an estimated rate anywhere from 1,230,330 to 1,339,200 mph.
The seventh velocity for the earth at the diabolical hands of heliocentrism is a cool 2,184,000 mph with the Hubble flow around the "Great Atractor", which does not even have a specific location
or stabilized point of reference, even in view of Chattanooga, Tennessee, where a scientific brochure says that one can see seven states from Lookout Mountain. For such an important place as the "Great Attractor" to have no location on a map of
the cosmos with no center could seem a little strange if not interrupted.
Vergil would say, "opera ingentia
pendent interrupta, aequataque machina caelorum ... et absque centro. A vast work hangs interupted, in some comparison of the scheme of the heavens ... and from the center.-3
Around and around the go-kart track: pedal to the metal, that's to the floor, never looking back. Eyes on the road up ahead,
hands on the wheel, keep pushing the pedal, spin the competition out, off we go. Turning tight, so we don't hit the trees.
A table of gigantic confusion speeds for the earth, therefore, according to heliocentrism, is as follows:
1. 66,600 mph around the sun
2. 492,130 to 446,000 mph around the galactic core, and then
43,200 mph towards Lambda Herculis
4. 15,658 mph upwards to the plane of the Milky Way
5. 827,670 mph in view of the cosmic microwave background radiation
6. 1,235,000 to 1,410,00 mph with the Milky Way around a localized group of
7. 2,184,000 mph with the Hubble flow around the "Great Atractor"
earth would have all these astronomical velocities applied to it at once, because of "gravity" and for the sake of heliocentrism, and then the different speeds of rotation North and South across all the latitudes. And the Chinese, for their part, have made many noodles and restaurants, and say that "near to rivers, we recognize fish, near to mountains, we recognize the songs of birds. It is very important to make on-the-spot investigations": 近
水 知 鱼 性, 近 山 识 鸟 音 (jìn shuǐ zhī yú xìng, jìn shān shí niǎo yīn).
And it remains true as Huey to Dewey and Louie Duck that "the wisest of the
wise will never make a crab walk straight"-4; but honest science could leave all this rubbish at the gate, and return to where there once was logic, some real possibility with facts, and a peaceful afternoon, also for the categorical wisdom of Aristotle. As all points on Earth are of the same unitary distribution as in a sphere, being composed together in a simple body with haecceitas, if any locality on Earth spins, then it all spins. If any area on Earth does not rotate, then none of it rotates. If any town on Earth rotates any one speed, then all of it goes that same speed, and
it cannot fly through the universe many different speeds at once.
Even for woods, water, and earth, in terms of any worldwide motion and
worldwide affects, it is either all or one, or nothing more than chaos and the unassuageable void of the abyss. With
this kind of cosmic situation of logic and physics, some things like heliocentrism simply are impossible, even for a beach ball, and an argument from impossibility is very strong in law:
argumentum ab impossibilii plurimum valet in lege.
Besides the preposterous incongruities attending acentric cosmology, sic passim pro diebus omnibus, if heliocentrism were able to have its cake and eat it too, and have many separable velocities and motions at once,
for all the latitudes along the spherical curvature of the Earth, the math is still not right in form but reverse. For forward motion, as they would have it, it all turns illogical and backwards, against the principle moment of inertia.
Stepping back to look at the Earth from space, with Marvin the Martian or Martin Sheen, the Equator’s
circumference is about 24,902 miles and its radius is about 3,963. Therefore, the 60th parallel North and all its neighborhoods comprise a circle of latitude about half that size around. Based on gear ratios, it has half the moment of inertia and
half the cogs and terrestrial steps of the Equator. It should therefore, in principle, turn twice as fast as the Equator to keep up for a day along the meridians. Littler wheels have to turn faster than bigger wheels to keep up; and if a high wheel bicycle
with a clown goes rolling by, the big wheel on his bike turns slower than the littler wheel in comparison.
As a high wheel bicycle goes one speed per time, a big wheel twice the size of a little wheel turns with half the radial velocity for any linear speed of the bike. The bigger wheel has a greater moment of inertia and radius and turns slower
than the littler wheel.
When Peggy an ice skater is spinning in circles, she spins
faster with her arms pulled in, because the moment of inertia in the circle is reduced. If she held her arms out, she would not spin so fast, and would have increased the moment of inertia by increasing the radius and extension of weight.
For all units and fractions, the math is the math, and the ratios are always simple and consistent:
a big wheel with four times the size of a little wheel will turn with one quarter the radial velocity of the littler wheel, and so on.
Since heliocentrism wants to have separable speeds and motion for latitudes, see how crazy it is. If two parallels like the 60th and the Equator
could be of divided origins of motion, as they were turning and burning forward in space, they would have to spin at ratios exactly the opposite from what heliocentrism has for them today. The circumference at the Equator is much greater, having twice the
radius and twice the moment of inertia as the 60thparallel. The different speeds quoted today for these two circles of the Earth, therefore, should be the reverse of how they are now, if they did have separate velocities around.
With the Equator as the big wheel of a high wheel bike, and the 60th parallel as the
little wheel, then when put forward in motion, the heliocentric math there is backwards everywhere in physics. The gear ratios of Copernicus and NASA are off. In terms of radial velocities converted into linear ones, for any true forward motion in space, in
separable parts, Quito, for example, should be spinning slower and half the speed of Helsinki, Finland, not 519 mph faster.
Continuing with heliocentric incongruities, by converting radial to linear velocity, the 75th parallel at the Arctic Circle, running through Norway, should be going four times as fast as any equatorial towns
-- to hit the same track at the same speed in outer space -- but instead it is supposedly going 769 mph slower.
Theorizing that the Earth orbits the sun, with no proof other than the progress of day and night, and then figuring first from time to the exclusion of space, for their crazy numbers, they have encountered accidentally a few persistent
and inevitable problems. It is not scientific but ridiculous, in fact, for heliocentrism to pretend that it represents any sort of rational cosmology.
While correct there is a universal 24 hour day around the earth, it is incorrect and rather off to say that the Earth spins at many different speeds along its latitudes to account for it. Incorrect
to say that the Earth can move several different rates at once, or be in more than one place for a moment, or that there can be more than one Earth with the same haecceitas, and that the Earth is not unique.
“Heaven cannot brook two suns, nor Earth two masters”, and as one for one, the circle of a sphere has only one center,
from which it is spun by the web of radians. The Earth does not have two or more different authentic codes of time and space that are real and to the point simultaneously. As one chess grand master said about it and the game, "simple is better than complex.
If something is too complicated, it does not mean that it is very clear. Quite the contrary, most probably it is something completely wrong."
As much as impossible chess from a computer, for random complicatons heliocentrism is inhumanly complicated,
as things can be when facts are reversed and the world turned upside down. Yet, however boiled down in the pieces, it and geocentrism are not equally transferable. The winner and loser are not the same, and it is not a draw or stalemate. With heliocentrism,
the computer loses. The queen is overloaded, the bishop hanging en prise, and the position and the pawns are lost.
math for them is not the same and, like Hawaii and Kenya, they are not the same difference. They do not both make sense and say fundamentally contradictory things at the same time about the same world. Heliocentrism is the wrong code all over in all parts,
because even if the terrestrial sphere were orbiting the sun at 66,600 mph, which is 29.8 km/per second, which it most certainly is not, it could not be moving in space around the sun, and with the solar system, with many separable speeds and simultaneous
motions without coming totally unstrung.
The uniformity of motion in an integrally
sound sphere is evident again in the wheels of any high wheel bicycle and bicycle shop. With total mag wheel surfaces instead of spokes, paint the smaller wheel blue, which would be ¼ the size of the larger wheel, and with one white radius line. Paint
blue the same 1/4 area of the larger wheel, and the remaining ¾ of the larger wheel red, with one white radius line through the blue and the red. Line the two white radii up horizontally to the ground. When they begin to roll, the bigger wheel has by
4 a proportionally greater moment of inertia and longer radius, and it will turn proportionally slower than the littler wheel, as the bike goes down the hill or across the road.
Watch as the bicycle goes by. The little blue wheel turns 4 times as fast as the bigger wheel. Although the blue areas in the two wheels are of the same radius, it is evident that the blue area within the larger wheel turns slower and with
the same speed as the rest of the bigger wheel. This is because the areas within either wheel move conformably with their respective origins of motion and radius domain.
In the case of the two wheels of a high wheel bicycle, there are three origins of motion: two immediate, one remote, and three species of velocity. The remote origin of motion is from
pedals, chain, and rider --the proximate cause. The two immediate ones to the road are the two wheels themselves that necessarily turn at different rates from their forks. The two wheels have different velocities of rpm, one distinct rate at a time for each
one, and two different moments of inertia, as the bike itself has one linear velocity per time, as it goes along ... into the traffic in front of the Judeo-Masonic Compound of the UN or wherever.
By natural composition, the area within the wheels in motion of the bike must have only one speed forward at a time, being in one place at a time, going
one direction at a time. For it cannot be any other way.
If another high-wheeler like
the first rolls by, with a chessboard pattern in the middle of the wheels, each chessboard will turn one uniform speed at a time, with one motion conformable to the whole. From square to
square, files and rows, from a1 to h8, and h1 to a8, with the same proportion of 1 to 4 between them as before, from big wheel to little wheel, there it goes.
The smaller wheel separated from the bigger wheel must have greater angular velocity for the same linear speed; and the entire bike itself, as a whole, is only one vehicle in motion and
must have one linear velocity, place, and direction at a time. As "that which is universal among men carries the weight of truth"-5, the high wheel bike cannot go two different speeds
at the same time, not even for Captain Kirk.
Everybody can notice the simple details; but nobody has ever been able to recognize that the Earth spins, with separable latitudes,
de motu quoque, big wheels or little wheels, spinning and spinning, round and round.
With correct terms of ontology and logic in order, even today, in fact, unless there is an earthquake, a rockslide, a volcanic
eruption, an avalanche, or a terrible earth-shattering storm, the Earth is quiet and has an attractive stillness about it all day. Simple and honest people everywhere witness the great composure and terrestrial solemnity, and nobody notices it turning or wobbling on its axis. People sense it as well as the
weather and the atmosphere; and like weather and atmosphere such a natural fact of awareness can even seep into the bones with some certainty of cognition.
Where the better form of knowledge is that
which also becomes a part of the knowing knower, the Greek word for it from the old desert solitudes is hésuchia, ἡσυχία, which
means stillnes, and with lucidity and peace.
Nevertheless, "modern life is chaos, not Cosmos. As such it lacks a center, is meaningless, aimless"-1, but not even
satellites or the International Space Station, or golfers with the greatest second sight, as the Scottish call intuition, have been able to detect any motion of the Earth. The detectable undetectable unaccelerated motion of the Earth is simply amazing, when
nobody can tell when everybody can.
"... no one has ever proved the Earth to be in motion and hence there remains the possibility that this (supposed) phenomenon
of our moving through space, which Einstein (and the official scientific community) considered 'already proven', after all does not even exist ..."-2
If natural of the occurrence, for motion to remain so, it would have to be more than constant. To go as undetected as immediately and always unrecognizable
of the Earth itself, it would have to be incredible, even preternatural, that nobody and no scientific test could ever once uncover it, except the tiny little subtle people in the grass. But the Earth clearly is not so diminutive, subtle, or
distant, but rather the most self-evident massively obvious property, with direct contact right under everybody's feet, magnified to the greatest priority among all things that are on it.
Always too near not to notice if it were flying, as Ptolemy outlined long before, if the Earth were orbiting the sun, it would have a tremendous astronomical circuit to keep, and an overwhelming velocity greater than that of all the other motions taking place across it. Since it would have to be making so great a circuit in so short a time, the bodies which are not at rest on it would always appear to have motions much less and contrary to its own, and all motions
on Earth would be outstripped and left behind by the Earth’s greater weight and momentum.
All the animals and loose objects, therefore, like aspirin and butterflies, birds, leaves, bees, empty beer cans, and thistledown, would fail to go eastward without great difficulty, because the Earth
would be spinning away from underneath them and tremendously. Dandelion seed heads, pollen puffs, and cigarette butts sifting in the air, arrows and squirrels, et cetera, would forever
be falling behind the Earth’s overwhelming flight into the Eastern sky. After the exhaustion of so much torque and so many days of heliocentric madness, all would tend to fall back to the West. Even the buildings and trees would become worn out from it,
falling back to the West, due to the erosive effects of occidental dilapidation. What is left of the Roman Colosseum, for example, in 157 feet of four levels, after
almost 2,000 years would be long gone.
Ave Caesar, morituri te salutant.
"Semper in obscuris quod minimum est seqimur". In difficult cases always take the least consequential course. So for fairness' sake,
let such an elementary school matter also be in the feet, and common sense experience of life: in the circles from the ground up and around everybody everywhere. Quod est ante pedos specta ubi coeli scrutantur.-3 Look at what is in front of you too when studying
Should one have knowledge by heavenly things above, yet not know what is here on the ground? With impartial foot the truth knocks at the door of the poor man’s cottage and at the prince’s gate. Aequo pulsat pede veritatis pauperam tabernas
"With a general peace the world was blest", and if people can notice when they have fallen
into a well, and leverage, and momentum of mechanical advantage in merry-go-rounds and Ferris wheels, how could they not notice if the Earth were rolling along like a bowling ball through space, and at such massive speeds?
It is not wise to let for want of repair a real house fall down to build a castle in the air-5, and any scene that could not get more quiet with less noise can fit the Earth. "The whole Earth is quiet and still, it is glad and hath rejoiced. Conquievit et siluit omnis terra, gavisa est, et exultavit,” etc.-6
"Inter sylvas Academi
quaerere verum", amid the woods of the Academy to seek the truth, and people on golf courses have gathered as much. In golf they say it is an easy game because the ball is not moving, and they mean the ball is not moving when time to hit and neither is the
Earth. It would be insane if it were otherwise. They all have to be quiet when a fellow gets ready to play his shot; and it always seems like the Earth is already completely quiet before them. Think of anything that could not get more quiet first.
Veritas de terra orta est. Truth is sprung out of the earth-7, and if a golfer
lost a tee shot to the woods, he cannot claim a free drop, without penalty, because the earth rotated from underneath the line of flight. If that would be the decision, because he was hitting along a difficult line of longitude, north or south, no one else
would agree. If that was how he kept score, others would say he was cheating, as much as when he plays by himself, because obviously the earth is not moving. After all, "by nature everything is just as it is." Esse quam videri, to be what is seen, they say
in North Carolina, or what you see is what you get.
Yet with virtue and honesty not so many are gifted as wish to seem so. "Virtute enim ipsa non tam multi praediti esse quam videri volunt". -8
they say silence is golden, like peace and goodness: "silentium est aureum quam pax et bonum". But how does a marketer of relativity and the heliocentric world-theory of spin-city buy
it? There is all the noise and flare and weird spaceship money involved in modernist science, that keeps going around, in predictions and interpretation of results, yet some people are not so dumb when they notice the total stillness and silence of the woods.
Nobody ever notices the Earth making a motion or a sound, as undoubtedly it would, if it were orbiting the sun. Instead people can almost hear a pin drop anywhere things get really quiet.
George Berkeley, the 18th century philosopher, had a motto for his books and a way to go about things, “esse est percipi vel percipere,” to
be is perceived or perceiving. To perceive as much as perceiving or being perceived, "nothing we use or hear or touch can be expressed in words that equal what is given by
the senses".-9 The senses and advertising too, in the modern era, where "advertising is the greatest art form of the century."
"Image is everything" said Andre Agassi on the TV commercials, and if the Earth were really rotating to orbit the sun, spinning and spinning, flying through
space, why is it then that it is never perceived? How can that be an honest commercial when no one ever senses it at all?
Human nature cannot know the mystery of an art without experience, and perception is always expressed as a factor of existence. One who knows perceives
what he knows, and knowledge is perception as well as proof.-10 "Knowledge is ultimate", and in divinis to know
and to be would even coincide.-11
For survivors of hazardous days, accurate perception is like gold, and "gold does not really change its value. An ounce of gold is an ounce of gold. It
was an ounce of gold 5,000 years ago. It will be an ounce of gold 1,000 years from now ... a constant and long standing store of value."-12 When the price of gold is going up or down, what is
fluctuating is the current price, not gold itself. Therefore, call 1-800 and buy now.
“Perceptio aurum”, perception is gold, and "hello, is that you?" averred Governor Agricola of ancient history and cable TV.
in the wilderness of modern life, with so many horrendous lies and abuses from the Judeo-Masonic NWO conspiracy on the loose, many modern people and animal friends today fall through the cracks in the floor, who would yet live or die by their wits. In
the wilds and in the city, they live and die by what they perceive and do. The most acute perceptions can sense many things, enough to save a life from misadventure on occasion, but never that the Earth is wheeling around in space, making gigantic and astronomical
numbers in time, like bats out of Hell, or hidden NASA caves and weird Area 51 secrets in Nevada.
The “Federal” Reserve
Bank and Wall Street, et cetera: perceptio aurum vel numquam aliud natura aliud sapientiae dixit. Perception is gold and never has nature said one thing, wisdom another. Pontus Maximus
observed that "when the little grey mouse has stolen the right amount of cheese, it was never too much".
As much as the eyes have an apple, people use the power of sight to survive, and vision is the best way to develop awareness. "The keenest of all our
senses is the sense of sight".-13
Isidore of Seville, for example, thought letters of the alphabet were were signs of things and mysterious figures,
and were so powerful because "without a voice they speak to us the words of the absent; for they introduce words by the eye, not by the ear ... sine voce loquantur nobis dicta absentium; enim introducunt verba per oculos non per aures".-14
As they may read or live, folks must look ahead to see what is in front, and from side to side to see
what is around. Above and below too, that way they get the meaning, and unless they have eyes in the back of their head, they will turn around to see what is behind, before a sneaking shadow or big terrible cat should catch them unawares. Folks need to see
what is moving one way or the other and what is not. With the greatest value of life itself placed before them, through all the ages of mankind, with whatever proper and total adherence of vision, no
people or church has yet seen the earth spin.
As it would be life science and worthwhile
comprehension, to survive and continue as a species, if a golf course and a small local airport lost their radial Earth-flight velocity in gradual steps of 40 mph, at what point could people start to tell what was going on? When would somebody pick up the
phone and call NASA?
For instance, located at 33”30’ N, and with
an estimated 865 mph daily spin, Augusta National could lose all of its angular velocity in a day like that, if it only lost 36 mph to an hour. At 36 x 24 = 864, Augusta, Georgia
would have only 1 mph left of spin to spare at the end of the day.
On such a
day, over a 4 ½ hour round of golf, a foursome out on the course, in the pines, the bushes, and in the water, could lose 144 mph of total terrestrial momentum, with which they had started from rotation for their latitude, and nobody would notice for
any of the lost golf balls or bad luck? If they came back later the next day, the golf course and the local airport would not be moving. It would be like “The Day the Earth Stood Still” unless they were skidding through space at 66,600 mph
and the 6 other cosmic speeds, without their rotation counted in, that they had lost, and what would that seem like?
Presumably they could not notice any
of the tension and crashing through space of the Earth then, without the spinning around, any more than they could not notice any of it before, with all the counter-clockwise roll. One could guess that it would seem just like it always had before, before the
day the earth stood still and they lost the spin, since it never seemed like the Earth was really moving or rotating at all in the first place.
As Hendrik Lorentz confessed, after the Michelson-Morley experiments of 1887, the year that Willie Park Jr. won the British Open at Prestwick: "Briefly, everything occurs as if the earth were at rest."-15
On the other hand, if the Earth did not lose its spin and some perceptive people went to the Shaughnessy
Heights Golf Club in Vancouver British Columbia at 49”13’27 N, therefore with 677.6469766684105 mph daily radial velocity, and then to El Condado Golf and Tennis Club in Quito, at the Equator, therefore, with 1038 mph daily radial velocity, would
they not notice any of the astronomical differences in playing conditions between these courses?
If Quito abruptly lost half its motor for a sudden 519 mph drop, and changed to the tune of the 60th parallel and Helsinki, Finland, would nobody notice? The strangest days that it could be either way.
If they went to Tromso Golf Park at Breivikeidet near Tromso, Norway, at latitude 69”39’30 N, therefore, with 360.6822404339137 mph daily radial velocity, in the land of the midnight sun, and then to the Billy Joss Golf Club in
Ulukhaktok, in Canada’s Northwest Territories, amid tundra off the Amundsen Gulf in the Beaufort Sea, at latitude 70”44’11 N, therefore with 342.314214650617 mph daily radial velocity, would they not begin to notice the different ways the
Earth was supposedly turning and burning in different places?
How could the portability of the grounds not be part of the way the game was being played? Would they be stoned, if they could not tell what was going on? Only to "rise and vanish like an oblivious host, shadows
of life whose very soul is lost? So let it lie, -- the lost golf ball and the grass below; scorecard and pencil, above the vaulted sky."-16
Who would not be able to play his next shot for commotion of fairway, bunker, or green, because the Earth was moving too fast?
Patrick Henry said, "I have but one lamp by which my feet are guided, and that is the lamp of experience", and the wise, humane, and philosophic statesman must deal with facts as he finds them.
Why do we leave for lands warmed by a foreign sun? What fugitive from his own land can flee from himself? Quid terras alio calentes sole mutamus? Patria quis exul se quoque fugit?-17
And "Socrates was told that some man had not been improved by travel. 'I am sure he was not', he said. 'He went with himself!' "-18
Therefore, "let each man choose the road he should take," unusquisque sua noverit
ire via, "but if you do not first lighten yourself and your soul of the weight of your burdens, moving about will only increase their pressure on you".-19
As soul to eyes, and eyes to soul, "the eyes of Lyncaeus were said to see through the earth, and we are symbols and inhabit symbols" of something deeper.-20 A cavernous silhouette overshadows
the workman, the golfer, the student, and the talent hidden in forms and logic, and the prince and the pauper; and the words and things they use and trade, and the consolations of philosophy, are reflections and shadows of the mind, emblems of something secreted
away in the universe.
"Flags and fags of our fathers", said Robert the Bruce who lived in a cave where he talked to a spider, and "the cave you fear to enter holds the treasue you
Si homines Lynceis oculis haberent, ut quaeque obstantia penetrarent, ita verum viderentur. If humans could use the eyes of Lynceus, so that their sight might penetrate obstructions,
they would then see reality. -21
And the symbols and habitations of heliocentrism are unhinged, thoroughly confused and divorced from reality. Geocentrism, on the other hand, "turns
the world to glass and shows us all things in their right series and procession", and "through that better perception, [it] stands one step nearer to things" as they are.-22
As much as Scotland adding up like a small mountain and sands of time by the North Sea, the
entire game of golf is a world of direct validity and scientific evidence for geocentrism and none at all for heliocentrism. If a relief for those who would prefer some pleasant scope of reality, there is no testable basis in science or way of keeping score for Newton's theory of universal gravitation by the inverse squared, or Einstein's theory of relativity. Whether there is still witchcraft that would turn a man into a newt, everything the false frame of reference does, as a game, demonstrates by contradiciton that the Earth is not moving, and that it is not true
that no one can tell.
On a trip to the 75th parallel of the Arctic
Circle, with only shag bags, beer, and cigarettes, and no golf course pro shop profit center in the wilderness, it would be a telling 769 mph difference from El Condado in Quito.
What travellers might notice is that, in terms of Earth spins, everywhere they go it actually seems most like the North or South pole, and the equator under a Foucault pendulum, in
terms of straight line tempo, because the North and South poles are at 90” N and 90” S, respectively, and, therefore, have a cosine value of (0), which indicates they are not actually spinning ab locis.
In a 90” angle from the Equator and evaluating a cosine value of (0), they are situated in two places with a (0) mph spin, which
is no action of rotation, of course. It would be like the poles are held stationary in space. Unless (0) mph is in motion, they are not revolving -- and (0) mph is not in motion. Could anybody wait at the starting line of a Formula One race better than at
No one could wait at the starting line of a Formula One race better than at
0 mph, and all of the Earth's rotational velocity likewise is necessarily stuck between the two poles, North and South. Still one sphere with “haecceitas”, the Earth can only go one for one from the middle to the ends at a time, with a uniform
motion conformable to the whole. As a simple body cannot move away from itself, and based upon experience and trigonometry, the Earth really must be revolving at (0) mph like the poles then, since that is what it always seems like and what all scientific
experiments have shown.
Tacitum sylvas inter reptare salubres, currantem quidquid dignum sapiente bonoque est. Walking in silence through the healthy woods,
pondering questions worthy of the wise and good.-23
A wise old owl sat upon an oak
The more he heard the less he spoke
Now wasn't he a wise old bird
Strix varia sapit, enim qui pauca loquitur
people believe heliocentrism, they imagine that it is undetectable and "unaccelerated" and, therefore, also an oxymoron that is practically “slow”. So slow, they figure, that the Earth is turning and moving so slowly in space that they do
not notice it revolving from day to changing day.
As the old gyroscope huckster
Foucault wrote in the “Journal de Debats”, on March 31, 1851, the “slowness” of the “movement of the Earth” … “requires us to turn to well-developed methods” for recognition of it.-24 But this is not reasonable.
In view of the magnitude of the cosmos, if the Earth were moving round and round to account for the passing of day and night, it could not be slowly. It would necessarily have to be at enormous astronomical rates through the seasons and years, incredibly
fast and impossible, which obviously it is not.
The Earth is continuously obvious,
massive and near, not scientifically remote, and whatever motion it may have could not remain so subtle or diminished as to be undetectable to all the people and scientists in common who are living on it.
For phenomena like the Earth to revolve, fly, tilt, wobble, and bowl around the Sun through the seasons and years, and totally unnoticed,
it would have to be with such an incredibly hidden and preternatural turn of events all the time that it simply could not be something within a category of natural phenomenon anyway. And that way Kepler's, Galileo's, and Newton's theories of "gravity"
would not be part of the simple continuity of natural science.
Blind as bats to
the glory and blaze of day, heliocentrism is abacinated by woeful complications. Ignorant of the self-evident science of actual awareness and the transfixed immobility of the earth, the captive unreason in it to things which by nature are most evident
and simple is stupefying.
Nobody can tell when the Earth rotates at 0 mph except to say that
apparently that is unaccelerated too. Nobody can tell when it spins 1038 or 1040 mph except to say that the day is 24 hours in Ecuador, as it is everywhere else. Nobody can tell when the surface tilts anywhere in between. Nobody can tell if it ever jolts or
crashes, but people can recognize when things in much smaller scales are jolted or go crashing across a table.
For instance, on a sunny afternoon in September, a colorful hot air balloon takes off into the sky from an immaculate field; and the crowd sees the aircraft ascend and move away from the earth, and the passengers and pilot in the wicker
basket see the same. Whether on the ground or in the air, all the little people involved in the occasion see the same momentary passage of time and the balloon flying away from the earth. Moving away from each other, the balloon and the crowd, and growing
smaller and smaller in each other’s sight, they witness that the field does not move, as the earth does not move, as the balloon flies in any direction to some lofty altitude. It is the same with all weather and spy satellites in low Earth orbit, and
onward to the Moon and the Sun that both orbit the earth, from east to west every day.
this, the natural world marvels the mind for a lasting impression on all the senses, yet heliocentrism would rather make chaos of the wonderful order and simplicity of the days. The amazing morphology
of the elements in the seasons interlineates a beautiful vision that works all weeks, per singulos dies and up to a few millenia, that would be cast away into an abyss of confusion and blindness.
If people tend to notice sleek and continuous things, like the fluent, the rich, the plush, and the passing of time and grammatical
genitives of association, like "the advantages of peace", "commoda pacis", for example, and nice weather, they would tend to notice if the Earth were moving, even if it were with a perfectly constant speed, if it were possible.
They say one does not notice the rotations of the Earth because gravity and inertia are ever-constant and so refined. But obviously
the spinning world is not constant but changes from latitude to latitude, even by degrees, minutes, and seconds of arc, where the conditional orbit is very diverse with contradictions of place, and would be very confused, acentric, and impossible.
Heliocentrism though would escape the senses and all objective scientific observations, if it could, but
it cannot escape mathematics and logic, even for astronomy. A simple body that is as unique as the one and only one that it is cannot be going many different speeds at the same time without coming apart.
Besides that, "the Central Intelligence Agency owns everyone of any significance in the major media", and it must be a conspiracy since it reaches a point of absurdity
where scientists today say the Earth orbits the Sun at an estimated rate of 66,600 mph, or 29.80 km/s, and the galactic core, with the Sun and the solar system, at anywhere from 492,130 to 446,000 mph; and also supposedly flies towards the constellation
Hercules and the star Lambda Herculis at 43,200 mph, and upwards at about 90 degrees to the plane of the Milky Way Galaxy at 15,624 mph; and would have the Earth proceed 827,670 mph with respect to the cosmic microwave background radiation,
the CMB, and orbit with the Milky Way Galaxy a more distant localized group of galaxies, away off in the distance, at an estimated rate anywhere from 1,230,330 to 1,339,200 mph, and then breeze along at 2,184,000 mph with the Hubble flow around the
A generalized feeling of aetherized confusion could set in, like J. Alfred Prufrock aetherized upon a table, beneath the detectable undetecatble unaccelerated
motion of the earth among the stars.
"Let us go then, you and I,
When the evening is spread out against
Like a patient etherized upon a table;
Let us go, through certain half-deserted streets,
The muttering retreats ...
And sawdust restaurants with oyster-shells ...
Time for you and time for me,
And time yet for a hundred indecisions,
And for a hundred visions and revisions,
And the afternoon, the evening,
sleeps so peacefully!
Would it have been worth while,
To have squeezed the universe into a ball
To roll it towards some overwhelming question,
To say: 'I am Lazarus, come from the dead,
Come back to tell you all, I shall tell you all'— "
... and would the out-of-touch numbers
of Copernicus, Gilbert, Kepler, Galileo, Newton, Einstein and NASA not seem exaggerated or crazy?
a bad joke of déjà vu, more than once, who has not noticed before that science cannot notice the relationship, and that it is all the same for indifference? For there is no way to see this sign. How did the cosmic mouse of such astronomical numbers
get so small that he always scurries away into the corners and disappears, where the earth is never moving?
deest hoc orbis, where this circle ends, vere non compos mentis sunt. "What need is there to weep over parts of life, when the whole of it calls for tears," and none of heliocentrism is even remotely possible without the Earth coming apart like a murder of
crows in the "Omen".
A cursed and diabolical theory in flight, in the classic sense of the word "diabolism", διαβολικός
, which means “to throw across, to break apart”, it kills the eye with unapparent wounds, like the imperial basilisk. With the acentric cosmology of heliocentrism, things are thrown far across and broken apart, like an image of chaos from Yeats’ poem “The Second Coming”, where the center cannot hold:
Turning and turning in the widening gyre
cannot hear the falconer;
Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold;
Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world,
The [heliocentric] tide is loosed, and everywhere
The ceremony of innocence is drowned;
The best lack all conviction, while the worst
Are full of passionate intensity.
Yet at times how little a thing is needed for one to be lost or to be saved. Still all material objects have a center, as much as all probabilities have
their mean, median, and mode: and the universe contains them all. Therefore, the universe has a center too, as common sense remains a primary form of proof in science, as much as logic, even where heliocentrism lacks it, for powerful and reasonable evidence
for geocentrism is all around.
Everything, even the strange and changeful, resources a type and a measure, and the measure of the days is against heliocentrism, as much as they
are not chaos. For example, the shadows of any eclipse at once disprove heliocentric theories of gravity and inertial relativity, as none of them are subject to gravity or inertia, and they all go to the East. They all move slowly to the East,
and the Earth never spins away from under them.