Dense vs Rare

Non bene junctarum discordia femina rerum,
Ubi frigida puegnabant calidis, humentia siccis,
Mollia cum duris, sine pondere habentia pondus.

John Robison, Proofs of a Conspiracy


que aliud obstabat aliis, quia in uno corpore,
frigida pugnabant
calidis, humentia siccis,
mollia cum duris, habentia pondus sine pondere
Deus et melior natura diremit hanc litem.

Ovid, Metamorphoses

Even if or when

There have been sages who warned that one should prepare the mind or prepare the rope. "Aut mentem parandam, aut laqueum", which means that life is not guaranteed, and that only with due application of reason and fortitude would man rise above the slings and arrows of outrageous fortune.-1 Therefore, like them, Antisthenes passed it on and taught that it will happen that one prepares himself mentally or hangs himself.


They have also said that it may be good to have a heart of iron, "ferreum certe tibi cor", if one would survive, since reckoning with the many-sided tangles of life will manifest itself practically.-2 Yet as all the days and years go by, there is not even the smallest fraction of universal gravitation by the inverse squared in rope or iron or connecting anywhere in the table of elements. Newtonian gravitation, in fact, is not between anything outside the mind -- not even between the salt water and the sea strand, not even beside the liquor store.


For the truth of experience has been rather that virtually everything in the world is by nature opposite to something else. It seems indeed that the Lord, or someone or something like the Lord, in at least some way, has "placed the sections facing opposite each other".

"Qui tollens universa, haec divisit per medium, et utrasque partes contra se altrinsecus posuit ..." and not all by the inverse squared more than one thing facing itself. And does it make fair sense by circumstance or whatever set that any one little circumstance of one little thing, even as a mere set, should play so large in its limit?

Yet as nothing comes from nothing, either way, as it is nothing, there is no branch of mathematics either, however abstract, which may not someday be applied to the phenomena of the real world. Ex nihilo nihil fit, even for pressure and elasticity of air, et cetera, and if gravity is not innate to matter, where is it then?

Not in the breeze or any sort of lateral force, "gravity" so-called does not move anything sideways; and in any true sphere, the distinction between the up and the down and to the sides is as arbitrary as committe convention. To the right or to the left, "pure space" everywhere is spherical. So what makes the Moon go laterally around the Earth from along the ecliptic then?

It must not be gravity or Newton's apple, and the inner law of nature remains "that nothing is ever begotten of nothing."-3 As from heavy darkness comes nothing light, nothing lightsome appears from the welling flooding dark, ipso facto: ex tenebris gravibus nihil luminosis apparere.



For all the fascination of obscurity, what Newton called gravity is not in the atmosphere or its elasticity, not to move clouds, for example, that do not gravitate but rather drift. Although air has mass and various densities, for instance, qualities, temperatures, and pressures from affinities and opposites, and so forth, the chemistry of the air or some charge or temperature of conduction in it in an area of tension is not the thing. To chemical agency and the world of medicine, it is yet as nothing, less than weigthlessness even, yet as far as things may be stretched "truth cannot be broken and will rise above falsehood as oil above water".-4

For instance, the beneficial medicine in one hand, or tricky poison in the other, does not take hold and have the effect because of gravity, which is only theoretical. Given that space cannot be occupied by more than one object, toxicology becomes rather important because of the specific reaction, where cell and atomic theory are in mutual contradiction, since any living space for a cell is not provided by the vacuum of a void, but rather comes about in some elemental contradiciton of it.

The correct dose comes from the simple relation of quantity and quality. Kepler’s, Galileo’s, and Newton’s occult action-at-a-distance, to explain a chaotic theory of the cosmos, is not discernible of any real treatment or interaction in science, in fact, and has remained strictly hoo-doo-hoo-diddy-dum with no assignable cause.


For example, the strangest thing to be conceived that also would be like nothing, even as dust in the wind, yet so heavy with impetus squared as to cause the Earth to sail away in astronomical rotations at the same time, is not in smelling salts, helium, hydrogen, oxygen, carbon, nitrogen, sodium acetate or H2O. It is not the reason for fatty acids or sulfuric compounds, even like the mercaptans or thiols that give skunks their defensive odor; and as much as vermouth with ice or vice versa, ice with vermouth, and club soda, it is not lurking somewhere in water, potassium chlorate, or sugar by the drops or by the pounds.

What a fix then when the universal gravitation is not discovered by the inverse squared even in a simple parachute that will not open. Even if the first error or the second mattered more, either one, or both cost too much, the balance in the outcome goes back to the cause. Not in the price of aerodynamics, aeronautics, or other porportions of any other figures or accidents, it is not to be found in steam, smoke, atomic weights, carbonation, liquid nitrogen, carbon dioxide, photosynthesis, or the leaves in the wind, et cetera. Campfires, cotton balls, marshmallows, electricity, metallurgy and the vapors are outside its vanishing domain; and it is not uncovered in the yields of any gold or silver mines. It is not even hidden in the little corners inside a box of matches, or the "flick of a bic" lighter instead of a match.


Yet nothing is greater than division by one, even if "no one does anything from a single motive"; and when Antisthenes beat Diogenes with his walking staff, it was not from Galilean or Newtonian gravity or universal gravitation, rather than simple ripeness, from either end of the stick.

As there is nothing that is what it is because of Newtonian gravitation by the inverse squared, there is nothing that weighs what it does because of such a theory either. Except for being what-for in the first place, and dividing by one, when feathers in Scotland were collected together, compressed, and made into old golf balls, covered in hardened leather, the gravity for the game came not from Galileo or Newton but from thick compaction and simple density applied by skillful manipulation. 


Outside the thing of it and without all computer code, as nothing would be, the Newtonian force of niconnomachy is still not there even when a computer room crashes or reboots, or if somebody pulls the plug on an entire building, or shuts out the lights. And neither is it innate anywhere between the sun and the moon or any other essential opposites. They have weighed silver and gold by the ounces and the pounds, and neither is the metal that it is because of Newton or the supposed force of universal gravitation that he specified -- since elemental substance proceeds from unique properties that are real in quale quid.


It is difficult to describe such a thing as an attribute, like flexibility or mobility, as so much other than the circumstances, yet if and when gravity was universal and constant, it would be all over for Quebec and the birds -- and for NASA, NAFTA, NIST, the UN, and the scientific-materialist globalist Foucaulty pendulum hoaxem of vast Judeo-Masonic conspiracy too, et cetera. Au revoir vers les belles histoires des pays d'en haut, if gravity was universal and constant, since it would make everything dense and heavy, annihilating everything that was rare and that would be light.

Where no birds and no planes or gliders could fly, one paper weight from the desk "would send all things wholesale to their demise". If things were not rather knit together loosely or tightly, then by the elements themselves, as they are with qualities and substance from among the connecting predicables, qua qua ens reale intercalato conextionibus, what a confused mess all experience would be.-5


This is so even with beehive hexagons, because concentration of density is necessary for gravity to have power. As much as the differences existing in bodies of equal size but different weight may have impact, gravity would be no such great supposed thing without density, and density is a measure and quality in contrast to "rarifiability" (a sort of neologism from rarefaction and friability). With priority of weight, therefore, and for that of such great importance and note, as posed to the world of science, it is the office of density to press all things downward or together with condensation. -6


Alcohol, for example, is more rarefied than water, a little less dense and going to the top. Having a little bit of fire in it as well, or what some may experience as joy, for taste and spirit, it is lighter and warms things up, adding a light burn for the pleasure. Even making people high, as some may say inebriated, indeed alcohol rises to the top, not because of Newtonian gravitation acting on water more than whiskey, but from the difference in density and chemistry between the two liquids.


Rarifiability and density are contrary qualities, it goes without saying. Polar opposites, and if one of two contraries were actually infinite ... that is also absolutely unlimited, constant, and universal ... then nothing contrary to it would exist in nature. Therefore, if gravity were absolutely constant, unlimited, and universal ... that is like infinite ... then there would be nothing rare and nothing light in contrast to it. That way everything would become very dense and very heavy, and that would be the end of it from Cape Finisterre to the birds and butterflies of Peru and Paracas Bay.


For instance, if the sun was infinitely hot ... that is universal and absolutely constant ... and its spatial extension of heat was everywhere ... like "gravity" ... either virtually or formally ... then it would leave nothing cold in the universe.-7 That would be it, without limit, not even to worry about the inverse squared, and the end of it that way also, if that were true, and there would not be any more ice.


The Department of Agriculture may "plow the land with the horn of a lamb", and sow seeds of peppercorn north of the dam (in the icy lake waters or mountain rocks), and reap it all with a sickle of leather -- yet not to worry what the elements may have in store for communist world subsidies of bad world bank government, of the Judeo-Masonic New World Order conspiracy, the Judeo-Masonic hustle of Marxist dialectics and Federal Reserve bank catabasis, for "a day of worry is more exhausting than a week of work."-8

Yet with a spirit of spirits between, behind, and beyond, plus ultra veritas vincit omnia. If truth conquers all, worrying about idiotic backwardness, mental illness, megalomania, credit manipulation and bad moral formation and the abuse of rockets and the confusions of criminal science cannot help. As Chauncey Gardiner (Peter Sellers) advised Jack Warden (the President) in the movie "Being There": "vacate et scire", be still and know that "as long as the roots are not severed, all is well and all will be well in the garden. In a garden, growth has its season. First come spring and summer, but then we have fall and winter, and then we get spring and summer again. There will be growth in the spring." etc.

for trigonometrical common sense, look at the the little 45 go around. It can only go one speed at a time, of course. The stereo turn table can only go one speed at a time. Like a record player, a ball or a solid sphere with density like the Earth can only spin one speed at a time. Even with the oceans, the land masses are substantial enough that it is the same with the Earth. The Earth cannot be spinning at many different speeds along its latitudes at once; but this sort of idiocy, that the Earth should be flying and spinning through space around the Sun, at many different speeds along its latitudes at once, to account for the 24 hour day, is what heliocentrism would have you believe. This way the spherical curvature of the Earth and the universal 24 hour day prove that the Earth is not moving, and that the Sun orbits the Earth. Even Alice Cooper the nightmare rock-and-roll woman and high school kids can understand this.


And there is no more reasonable and simple way to explain the changing position of the Sun, in view of the background stars of the ecliptic, through the course of every year, than to say that the Sun and stars orbit the Earth every day, since the Earth is always in between every opposition of the planets and stars in whatever range of the syzygies.

Latin sayings:

"Ferreum certe tibi cor", The Philosophy of Schopenhauer p.47, certainly a heart of iron.

"Aut mentem parandam, aut laqueum", ibid p.49, prepare the mind or the rope --- life is not guaranteed, prepare yourself or hang yourself.

"Homo sum, et nihil humani a me alienum puto", Terence, I am a man, and nothing that is human is alien to me.

"Quis id coxit coquus?", Plautus, what cook prepared this? (Plautus, Menaechmi)

"Nec pistoris nomen erat, nisi eius qui ruri far pinsebat" (Varro) Nor did the noun pistor (a crusher) exist, except for the man who ground corn in the country.