about the Moon

"There is nothing that you can see that is not a flower; there is nothing you can think that is not the moon."

Matsuo Basho

 

 

 

 

that disprove heliocentrism

"Il n'y a pas de hors-texte", said the Derrida student to the four relay midgets who were soon to race the camel. It was cool desert nighttime air at the track under spotlights and a quincunx Moon. "Ex luna scientia, etiam astris, from the moon comes knowledge, also to the stars", said another, a midget coach from the exchange in a Puma windbreaker. No excuses whatever the outcome, yet modernist science cannot explain such presence together in society or that of the Moon above any better than chaos theory, or the cat who had nine lives. Anaxagoras from the 5th century BC stated simply: "Everything has a natural explanation. Short people or tall people, whatever it be, and the moon is not a god, but a great rock, and the sun a hot rock".

 

The mediocre man has the greatest chance to be at his best, and all the ideas about things are the same though what to do with them and how and why is another question. Or what to have about them may not be related in cause and effect, not exactly anyway, not immediately some would say, but one could say we still live in a world full of coincidence, and sometime responsibility; and the favored scenario today is the giant impactor hypothesis, where it is said that approximately 4.5 billion years ago there was an indirect collision between Earth and an astronomical body the size of Mars, and the result was the creation of the Moon. Thus it is that the full Moon may remain so cool and clean over however much garbage there is on Earth.

 

Before the impact theory became popular, George Darwin (1845-1912), son of Charles Darwin, suggested that the Earth and Moon had once been one body, and that a molten Moon had been spun away from the Earth due to centrifugal forces. However, Darwin’s theoretical calculations could not resolve the mechanics required to trace the Moon back to the Earth’s surface.

 

Dr. Reginald Daly of Harvard University first challenged Darwin’s theory in 1946, and in the 1970’s Dr. William K. Hartman and Donald R. Davis began to popularize the great impact theory with updated planetary models. So from the 1980’s, more or less, planetary scientists have concluded that the Moon came into being about 4.5 billion years ago, when a Mars-sized object struck the earth with a glancing blow, and created a disk of debris that reformed itself into the Moon.

 

However, if mathematics of the sphere and of rest and motion are fairly considered, all the Copernican models from Darwin down to today are false and need to be deconstructed. If the 24 hour day and common sense physics, the Coriolis effect, the Foucault pendulum, and all interferometer and aether drift tests were not enough to demonstrate the invalidity of Copernicanism, nine easy points about the Moon positively disprove such an unfounded idea. After all, nature and its effects, such as the phases of the moon, are the mathematical consequences of only a given number of immutable laws or powers of relation.

 

1. It does not affect the Earth’s tides. There is an extenisve and powerful neutral gravity zone between the Earth and the Moon. So-called gravity, in fact, is neither a lateral nor vertical force, and the Moon does not circle the Earth because of gravity. It circuits the Earth from an extra-terrestrial momentum generated in its own sphere.

2. The Moon goes from East to West across the dome of the sky, orbiting the Earth clockwise when viewed from above the North Pole. 

3. It orbits the Earth in an average of about 24 hours and 50 minutes every day.

4. It does not rotate ... and neither does the Earth.

5. When closer to Earth at perigee, it travels slower, not faster, than when further away at apogee.

6. It orbits the Earth within a distributed range of uniform curvature, as in a range of circles, one last vanishing step at a time, not a clumsy ellipse; and all long exposure star trail photography demonstrates this as well.

7. The lunar aspects in conjunction with the stars also indicate that the metaxological character and isometric panorama of the Earth are unique, and that the Earth is in and in between all signs of the ecliptic all the time. The Earth's position is the only one in all the signs all the time.

8. In the sky, the Moon has the same angular diameter as the Sun, 30 arcminutes, and the shadows of all eclipses fall to the East. The shadows of eclipses fall slowly and progress to the East without the Earth ever turning or spinning away from underneath them.

9. The durational aspects and phases that it forms in alignment with the Sun and other planets and stars of the ecliptic show that the Earth is not moving.

The flying saucers some people see are probably not piloted by little green men. They are remotely piloted EMP vehicles built by human engineers. The Germans started building early flying saucers in World War II, "die Glocke" and others with "repulsing" flight technology. The Americans followed, but not so well, with Avro Cars. The technology development of the EMP UFO flying saucers and flying triangles is highly classified, but it is not little green men.

The US Navy and UCLA built a little EMP submarine (about some time in the '60's). The "USO's", the UFO's that fly in an out of water, are designed and built by human engineers. They get their batteries charged up by the salt water.

The aliens and strange black entities to worry about are the ones from down inside the Earth. Inside the earth is where traditional Roman Catholic theology and Dante and ancient sources locate Hades, which is Hell.

Modernist science cannot explain why the Moon is even there, or why it goes around the earth. It is not because of "gravity". They don't know how long it has been there and going around the earth, and they do not know how long it will continue.

Darwinist and "scientific" materialist dating methods are not empirically scientific --- not just about the moon. The hugely exaggerated numbers they use also for their false chronologies about whatever they dig up out of the dirt are not empirical but metaphysical.