If "it was like deja-vu all over again", when one would be walking on the runway at the airport, some windy day, then observe the wind and fixture of the Earth: and think about the effects of any dangerous
Corde pulsum tangite: pluck the vibrating strings, and watch a wind-lashed plane come in to land.
"The might of the awakened wind lashes the ocean and o’erwhelms vast ships and scatters the clouds, and anon scouring the plains with tearing hurricane
it strews them with great trees, and harries the mountain-tops with blasts that rend the woods: with such fierce whistling the wind rages and ravens with angry roar."(1)
Fortuna, velut luna: statu variabilis, semper crescis aut decrescis." Fortune is like the moon: changeable, ever waxing and waning, and as much as Lucretius and Carmina Burana, people in planes about to crash know, and sometimes it may seem like "all
of this has happened before, and it will all happen again".
The movement of severe crosswinds and the plane
may make it very dangerous, but there is never any movement from the airport runway or the Earth. The terra firma does not move. If an unfortunate plane does crash, trying to land in the midst of strong winds, it hits solid ground that is not moving. Like
a thick brick wall, it is totally obvious that the Earth is motionless, whether flying in a plane or not, and the only navigation that works at all is based on fixed-earth coordinates.
"For it is in respect of what is present that man's wit is increased"(3); and if people already know aches and pains, and appreciate vividly the dangers of plane crashes, and torture, how could they not notice
if the Earth were in motion? Because if it were, it certainly would be an added hall of excruciation, terrorizing everyone and increasing a perilous environment.
It goes without saying that actuality is something not only for pen and paper: the sense of actual awareness seeds in the pith and marrow of understanding.
However life is now, it would be all over the place, all out of kilter, if the Earth were spinning around, and around, and around, every day, at astronomical rates, to orbit the Sun. Not only the UN, it would completely derange the humble science of ornithology,
not just poor pilots and mechanics, but all the turkeys and the straw.
Charles Linbergh once said,
"I realized that if I had to choose, I would rather have birds than airplanes", yet the entire species of condor Vultur gryphus, for instance, soaring high over the Andes, would find himself
lost over the Pacific Ocean in no time, if the earth spins more than 1,000 mph into the east. Majesty unraveled and the world unglued for those great birds, and the other neornithes and
passerifomes like them in nature, that leave their nests in the morning, and they would not be able to find home again in the evening.
"The airplane has unveiled for us the true face of the Earth", and passer domesticus etiam delenda est. The house sparrow is up for destruction where the earth flies away, and zunzuncito, the smallest living bird, a
hummingbird from Cuba, will not make it either. There is not a place small enough to hide.
goes as well for every pilgrim of the wingèd shoe, with more than 1,000 channels of television and doublespeak. Some discussions can become powerful modes of broadcast confusion, like relativity and the 4th dimension; but all aviation
navigation is based on a fixed-Earth assumption, and GPS follows suit, and it all works because the Earth is not moving. The satellite-based global positioning system follows the same fixed-Earth assumption as pilots and navigators, and aerospace engineers
assume a fixed-Earth coordinate system when launching and guiding satellites.
materialism would allow that Newton's theory could be employed arcanely to describe the falling of an apple, but gives the wrong answer for GPS, but Newton's theory is really wrong in both cases. And when t-shirt devotees of Einstein would say that the Special and General Theories of Relativity come to the rescue, and would have anything to do with GPS and aviation navigation, or the falling of an apple, they are not playing from a full
deck. In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is King: “in regione caecorum rex est luscus".(4) Where
they say "relative" and “absolute”, insist that they should also mean "authentic". Insist on authenticity. Without authenticity what is the point?
After all, some information
is useless. "There are three kinds of intelligence: one kind understands things for itself, the other appreciates what others can understand, the third understands neither for itself nor through others. This first kind is excellent, the second good, and the
third kind useless."(5)
Relativity's concept of time and motion is useless. The time around
the earth is always simple and "in stereo", from Greek meaning solid and complete. It is only one day and one phase of the moon at a time. For gratuitous illustration, when it is Tuesday, it is Tuesday all day; and neither the moon nor the sun can be in two
or more different places at once. Any communication complications or time lapses with satellites vis-a-vis the earth are not due to Einstein's doublespeak versions of time and motion, or from the counting of time from major objects like the Moon, the Sun,
and the Earth. They follow only from interstitial motion between minor objects, and the operations of a device itself, and the extension and divisibiltiy of space between other minor objects, or any interference involved, which also are authentic. Reality
does fill the void.
The Special and General Theories of Relativity contradict each other, and
where they would introduce Einstein's value of “c”, the supposed constant speed of light in GPS calculations, into the normal course of things, to show that E=MC^2 and
relativity would have some practical application, there resurfaces the old trick where the value in question, "c", gets reset equal to one. Like Galileo's "gravity", division or multiplication by one, it goes without saying, does not affect anything.
Relativity is only an abstract theory clouded over in smokey math fummdiddles and funny tricks. It is not useful for applied
sciences like navigation or GPS, and it has not been useful for development of nuclear power or EMP technologies either. In applied science, it is the natural truth that matters, and the center must hold ab origine, from the source. In “relativity”,
on the other hand, the truth does not matter and there is no center.
For example, when planes come in for landings at the airport, they are never moving as fast as the Earth, and the Earth is not even moving. As well, by natural law of physics, the navigator of a vehicle can only be in one place at a time, go one
speed at a time, with only one direction at a time. The navigator cannot move away from himself, and neither can any other object: neither the earth nor the sun, nor any of the GPS satellites in question. The coincidence of natural subsistence is a form of
precision placement that technology cannot excel, no matter how much doublespeak and small print of "inertial and noninertial frames of reference" there could be.
If the Earth spins at 1523 feet per second in Quito, Ecuador, and a helicopter is hovering in the air from more than a hundred feet, or about 10 stories, over a stationary position, the ground below does not
move. So is there any view from outer space which would show a rotating Earth that would beg to differ? Are there any space videos or NASA cameras that would show a rotating Earth, would that it were, since no once can tell by flying in planes or helicopters?
"There are, in reality, no videos anywhere actually showing a rotating or moving Earth: no real video [of such] anywhere;"(6) yet a few on
YouTube and the internet pretend to show a revolving Earth when viewed from more distant locations in space; but they are manipulated film animations to create an illusion, and they only beg the question, if the Earth is revolving why can nobody recognize
it, and why does it remain perfectly undetectable?
And if "gravity" is so powerful and universal in nature, why is it weaker
than all forces we are able to experience directly? Why is it weaker than the tiniest refrigerator magnet, and why is it not any lateral force?
One instance of canned satellite images converted into deceptive moving pictures meant to depict rotation of the Earth has come from NASA's "Terra" program. The 'Terra" satellite is the flagship of NASA's "Earth Observing System", which comprises
a "series of artificial satellite missions and scientific instruments in Earth orbit designed for long-term global observations of the land surface, biosphere, atmosphere, and oceans of the Earth".(7) The "Terra" faculty was launched December 18, 1999,
and began collecting data on February 24, 2000, and has been an important part of NASA's "Earth Science Enterprise", formerly called "Mission to Planet Earth". With this project, NASA would hope to better "develop a scientific understanding of the Earth system
and its response to natural and human-induced changes to enable improved prediction of climate, weather, and natural hazards for present and future generations".(8)
from the "Terra" satellite are real enough, but the rotating meridians are an illusion, like an old art studio kineograph from "The Inkwell Imps". The video is a rapid display of
sequenced images to create the illusion of movement. In an article from October 6, 2011 by Robert Simmon, "Crafting the Blue Marble", the creators of the spinning Earth video explain
how the simple illusion was created like a flip book projection.
In 2002 Reto Stockli was working on a global picture map of the earth intended to impress, and "Terra" was gathering
high resolution color images of the entire earth. To showcase the imagery a special team put together about 10,000 satellite scenes (each file over 300 MB), which were collected over 100 days. They stripped out the clouds and created a 43,200-pixel by 21,500-pixel
map of the Earth, and later overlaid the clouds back in.(9) It was a fancy techno kineograph, manipulated with prime photography and "chrome", yet "tellecor" was never moving. It was the satellite that was orbiting the Earth --- not the earth spinning and
flying to orbit the Sun, of course. What all satellites discover is the same as what all pilots discern, and up to the international space station at 200-250 miles in low earth orbit, whenever they fly: that the earth is not moving. From 100 stories to 20,000
feet, and on to 200-250 miles (or 1,056,000 or 13,200,000 feet) in low earth orbit, the essential property at the center will not change.
From the man on the ground high in the mountains, to condors flying far up in the sky, the essential property and fixation of immobility of the terra firma does not change: and a lemon tree rustled by the wind is the
same seed, from the garden to Saturn, even if an all-seeing eye exists that knows much better about universal metaxology than NASA.
Besides begging the question of relativity, when NASA or anyone else pretends that there is some honest visual evidence of a rotating Earth from a view taken deeper out in space, they are only adding other fallacies
to the scene. As they say, "errors may beget errors, and mistakes may increase". Yet “an error does not become truth by reason of multiplied propagation, nor does the truth become error because nobody will see it."(10) And "any man can make mistakes,
but only an idiot persists in his error".(11)
“Error, indeed is never set forth in its naked deformity, lest, being thus exposed, it should at once be detected.
But it is craftily decked out in an attractive dress, so as, by its outward form, to make it appear to the inexperienced more true than truth itself.”(12) And they say errare humanum est, "but to perisist in error is diabolical",(13) as much as NASA
still pretends that it has landed on the Moon and Mars, and that its Galileo spacecraft and Epoxi space mission somehow were able to obtain undoctored film of the rotations of Earth,
seen from way out in the solar system, like Kepler's "Dream", "Somnium Sive Astronomia Lunaris", where Kepler is taken to the Moon by demons, and from there sees the Earth revolving, while nobody at home can.
The fools in charge would claim that Galileo took images of a rotating Earth from 2 to 2.7 million kilometers away in mid December, 1990; and
that Epoxi took similar images of the Earth from 31,000,000 million miles or more in May, 2008. Yet in early December, 1990 the Galileo spacecraft was only 597 miles away from Earth, but they do not have images of a revolving Earth from there, but supposedly
only from millions of miles away instead. It is the same story with Epoxi. In December 2007, it was less than 10,000 miles from Earth, but there are no images of the spinning earth from there either, but supposedly only from millions and millions of miles
away in May 2008.
The series of Epoxi photos that were put together as an animation to suppposedly show the Moon transiting around the revolving Earth, 28 and 29 May, 2008, from
a view supposedly taken 31,000,000 miles out in deep space, are so obviously fake that they look like they came from the "Deep Fried Twinkies Space Movie" or "Revenge of the Nerds", and they have the Moon going the wrong way again, of course, counter-clockwise
rather than clockwise. And the clouds are all marbleized too, frozen together like an ice wall, or the great snowflake, even as the earth supposedly spins and spins away.
sees the supposed film of a rotating Earth from deep space, the clouds are always marbleized. Like the seven continents on a billiard ball, the clouds rotate swiftly with the Earth, but never move independently within the design, just the opposite of video
from a weather satellite tracking storm clouds and hurricanes. The clouds move but the land masses do not, and "gravity" does not move clouds, any more than the weather comes from "gravity". Contrasting patterns in the elements of dryness and moisture, air
pressure, and temperature conditions move clouds.
Judeo-Masonic controlled NASA has been sitting crooked at the dice table and gubbament gravy train too long, and for a sort of
gambler's fallacy, which is close to the hot hand fallacy, to imagine that going further out into space with a billion dollar'd art project will somehow help survey the detectable undetectable and unaccelerated motion of the earth. The
probability of seeing the Earth spin from far away remains the same as it is up close: nil and as close to nil as it can get.
The gambler's fallacy is "when a person assumes that a departure from what occurs on average
or in the long term will be corrected in the short term."(14) In other words, the detectable undetectable and unaccelerated motion of the Earth that everyone has experienced
here for millenia, as not existing, will be corrected by another view, and another roll of the dice, taken from another mile out in deep space.
For instance, on August 18,
1913, at the casino in Monte Carlo, black came up a record twenty-six times in succession at the roulette wheel. The air was electric and there was a near-panicky rush to bet on red, beginning about the time black had come up a phenomenal fifteen times. Following
the doctrine of maturity of chances, also a gambling fallacy, players doubled and tripled their stakes, believing after black came up the twentieth time there was not a chance in a million of another repeat. In the end, the unusual run enriched the Casino
by some millions of francs.(15)
1. Call it black or red or snake
eyes: the motionless earth has happened. In fact, the "Day the Earth Stood Still" has been in occurrence over thousands of years, for everyone to see.
2. Yet this departs from heliocentrism and what is expected by NASA and the Bank of England to occur on average or over the long term.
Therefore, the phenomena of a stationary earth will come to an end, when NASA takes a picture of it from far enough out in space, when the dice roll one more time from further away.
Like Galileo and Einstein, they commit the fallacy of equivocation by using a term in two or more different senses within a single argument. "For an argument to work, words must have the same
meaning each time they appear in its premises or conclusion."(16) Arguments that switch meanings of the words equivocate, and, therefore, do not work. "If the words in the premises and the conclusion mean different things, then the premises and the conclusion
are about different things, and so the former cannot support the latter," etc.(17)
An example could be:
NASA would like to encourage heliocentrism, acentric cosmology, and relativity by one formula or art deco picture or another.
acentric cosmology, and relativity together represent a psychosomatic condition of stagnosia* resulting from excessive consumption of fast food, cheap spirits, Time Magazine, and complicatedly incomprehensible math fummdiddles.
Therefore, NASA would like to distribue "E=MC^2" and posters of Einstein to math students more frequently.
Like relativity in so many "inertial/noninertial frames of reference", the major predication of heliocentrism remains equivocal ad infinitum. It always comes back to
ambigutiy and doublespeak. Is it the NASA spacecraft and its camera that is at "rest" frame by frame or the Earth, as the Earth "spins and spins"? Where does the still frame come from?
Bill Clinton used to say, "fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me". And for his part, Bob Seger of the Silver Bullet Band used to croon, "blame it on midnight, shame on the Moon ...
it's all around
Comfort in a crowd
Strangers faces all around
Laughin' right out
Hey, watch where you're goin'
Step light on old toes"
Until you've been
up to the top of the North pole, you may not really know.
"When nothin comes easy, old nightmares are real.
Oh, blame it on midnight
Ooh, shame on the moon
Oh, blame it on midnight
Ooh, shame on the moon"
Once taken by the ways of foolery and half-truths, fallacies and lies, the mind can be swept away by a river of dither and confusion. And the fallacist's fallacy can remain comfortably numb
in pursuit of it all, the old fool-once-removed, with NASA from the Moon to the stars.
If one would say that 2 & 2 are 4 by some method that is absurd, well then 2 & 2 are
still 4. Even if one only makes an appeal to a buffoon for authority, it still is correct to say that 2 & 2 are 4.
It is true, and if one said, after turning off the TV, "I realize Dr. Teller was right: the Sun orbits the Earth, the Moon does not rotate, and neither does the Earth: and NASA has never landed on the Moon." Well, post hoc ergo propter hoc,
turning off the TV helped the realization of the truth about the position of the Earth in the cosmos.
fool once removed has that feeling, and knows the flow, when the opposition knows, that he is going to make move "A", even if it would be a secret, because that seems like that would be the best thing to do, and that, therefore, however, perhaps to be smore
strategic, he should make move "B" instead. If the opposition knows that he will make move "A", the opposing party is already prepared against it: so, in consideration of the stupidity of perception and information, and the defense prepared against "A", since
by convention that would be best, he would make "B" instead, for suprise. And the opposition knows as well that "A" remains obvious, so "B" is what will actually happen instead, to avoid loss of advantage by the conspicuous token. Yet "B" is not so much of
a surprise or better second either, since the opposition knows to expect the unexpected, and already has prepared for that. So to keep it simple and back to basics, "A" could be the trick more than it seems, and a surprise, yet most direct for the win, while
"B" has been statistically identified and foreseen, even if unexpected. And the same problems of doubt and speculation go for "C" and "D", and "E" and "F", in their turns, and the rest of the alphabet, whether they lead back again to "A" or "B".
Besides bad logic, the notion that one could see the Earth rotate if a view were taken from far enough
out in deep space calls into question the whole value of the human intellect: its memory, understanding, experience, and presence. Memory is such a fundamental part of human understanding that no one understands what he cannot remember and no one remembers
what he cannot understand, at least superficially.
In the ancient world, men valued memorization highly and looked down on "taking notes". The art of memory was regarded as a fundamental
part of rhetoric, oratory, and law. For instance, Socrates disparaged relying too much on notes. He said, "if men learn this, it will implant forgetfulness in their souls: they will cease to exercise memory because they rely on that which is written --- or
which they see in false videos from NASA --- calling things to remembrance no longer from within themselves."(18)
unfortunately, in many cases, memory is useless or nonexistent. With so many techno crutches like smartphones and instagram, computers and calculators, besides the effects of large scale brain washing, the ability to remember has slowly faded over time.
On that count, the ancient world was different. According to tradition, the oldest and most reliable method of developing a clear memory is called the "method of place", modus loci, which
traces back to the story of Simonides of Ceos and the collapsing banquet hall. He was in attendance at a great banquet and was called outside by a visitor. While he was outside, the entire building collapsed in a disaster and many people died. It was terrible,
and when they were recovering the bodies for burial many were crushed beyond recognition, but Simonides was asked to identify them because he could remember where they had all been seated.
a little grisly, it still is the oldest description of the mnemonics of the "memory palace", which uses spatial awareness to memorize large amounts of information. A memory palace is a simple and systematic way to improve memory by using the imagery of place.
Geometry facilitates spatial learning and depth of cognitive awareness, of course, including memory and understanding, so that if valuable information to be recalled is stored inside a design like a palace or a warehouse, it can more easily be retrieved.
Memory provides delineation, a layout like a building or a ship, or shops on a street, or any geographical entity composed of a number of discrete loci. When a set of items or things to do
needs to be remembered, it is easier for recall in a structure, since one then walks through these loci of the mind, which have been committed to memory by place. The organized design helps bring things to mind that might otherwise be forgotten, since a distinguishing
image forms between an item and its locus. The same as a filing system or an alphabet on the shelf, walking through the set 1,2,3 retrieves incidentals and particulars intended for memory storage within easy reach, by the mental association of them and their
features with specific locations, etc.
And as much as any memory palace, the Earth is mnemonically good and convenient for retrieving facts. With seven continents and seven oceans,
in a perfect sphere, it is well arranged by nature for total recall; and when any astronuat out in space has memories of the earth, they should be that the Earth is not moving, and it does not orbit the Sun. People may remember hometowns and houses, different
days and golf courses, old streets and friends, and words that somebody said, but nobody remembers the Earth spinning around and around to fly through space and orbit the Sun.
However, it may be true that one man's memory may be another man's clown car: and the clowns never stop coming out. Some heliocentric jesters coming out of a Volkswagen Beetle at the circus
go so far as to suggest that meteors, meteorites, and meteor showers, much less the moons of Jupiter, would prove that the Earth spins.
The argument juggles another false dilemma, like Galileo's telescope, based as it is on questionable cause and post hoc ergo propter hoc.
Meteor showers would call in doubt the already plentiful and extensive evidence that the earth is not revolving? A false apprehension about the asteroid belt and comets would justify the errors
It would seem some cannot bear the simplicity of things in right order with nature, by appropriate qualities of weight, sphere of influence, and haecceitas, and
in constant view of the immobility of the Earth, and that all equability and perfection is given to the circle of natural laws of motion by geocentrism. As if one thing that is like so and so, on one end of the stick, should contradict the other thing that
is not like this but rather like that, on the other end, and that both or either should contradict the stick itself: or the wheel of which it would be the axle, if their were a wagon, with however many different things arrayed around it.
Some of the heliocentric clowns refuse to acknowledge the Earth for its unique and present characteristics of total metaxological immobility, as if one sign from the truth should contradict another.
They fear to abase the data about meteorites and the asteroid belt to elevate the apparent facts of geocentrism.
The evasion and ignorance in all this is astounding. From Galileo's
telescope out of a clown car, to NASA's fake trips to the Moon and Mars, those opposed to common sense would make a mummery of science to obscure the truth that the penguin does not contradict the scorpion, and neither do they or meteorites or the moons of
Jupiter contradict the stationary position of the Earth. All truths are interconnected and supported by other truths, and heliocentrism has progressed no further than what sophistry it has been able to accomplish: no further than the Foucault pendulum, misinterpretations
of stellar aberration, math fummdiddles --- one cold drop of which could freeze a frog --- and faulty enthymemes.
The simple fact remains, certainly, that all motion in the cosmos
is totally agreeable with logic, principles of authenticity, and the transfixed immobility of the Earth that rises up around everyone everywhere, as much as the ghost in the machine.
... htraE eht stibro nus eht dnA ? gnivom ton si htraE
eht llet uoy t'naC ? denots uoy erA